views: ensure we only show results once in recipe search

Usage of itertools.chain() that was introduced in
3155206e54 in order to prioritise matches
in the recipe name resulted in recipes showing up twice in the results
if they matched in both the name and the recipe name. Use a custom
chaining function that skips duplicate results in order to fix this.

Fixes [YOCTO #10177].

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Eggleton 2016-10-19 16:36:14 +13:00
parent 7dce7ad681
commit c6105d69cf
2 changed files with 14 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -237,3 +237,13 @@ def lock_file(fn):
def unlock_file(lock):
fcntl.flock(lock, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
def chain_unique(*iterables):
"""Chain unique objects in a list of querysets, preserving order"""
seen = set()
for element in iterables:
for item in element:
k = item.id
if k not in seen:
seen.add(k)
yield item

View File

@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ from django.core.exceptions import PermissionDenied
from django.template import RequestContext
from layerindex.models import Branch, LayerItem, LayerMaintainer, LayerBranch, LayerDependency, LayerNote, Recipe, Machine, Distro, BBClass, BBAppend, RecipeChange, RecipeChangeset, ClassicRecipe
from datetime import datetime
from itertools import chain
from django.views.generic import TemplateView, DetailView, ListView
from django.views.generic.edit import CreateView, DeleteView, UpdateView
from django.views.generic.base import RedirectView
@ -27,6 +26,7 @@ from django.utils.decorators import method_decorator
from django.contrib.auth.decorators import login_required
from django.contrib import messages
from reversion.models import Revision
from . import utils
from . import simplesearch
import settings
from django.dispatch import receiver
@ -213,12 +213,11 @@ def bulk_change_edit_view(request, template_name, pk):
def bulk_change_patch_view(request, pk):
import os
import os.path
from layerindex.utils import runcmd
changeset = get_object_or_404(RecipeChangeset, pk=pk)
# FIXME this couples the web server and machine running the update script together,
# but given that it's a separate script the way is open to decouple them in future
try:
ret = runcmd('%s bulkchange.py %d %s' % (sys.executable, int(pk), settings.TEMP_BASE_DIR), os.path.dirname(__file__))
ret = utils.runcmd('%s bulkchange.py %d %s' % (sys.executable, int(pk), settings.TEMP_BASE_DIR), os.path.dirname(__file__))
if ret:
fn = ret.splitlines()[-1].decode('utf-8')
if os.path.exists(fn):
@ -387,7 +386,7 @@ class RecipeSearchView(ListView):
qs2 = init_qs.filter(entry_query).order_by(*order_by)
qs2 = recipes_preferred_count(qs2)
qs = list(chain(qs1, qs2))
qs = list(utils.chain_unique(qs1, qs2))
else:
if 'q' in self.request.GET:
qs = init_qs.order_by('pn', 'layerbranch__layer')
@ -739,7 +738,7 @@ class ClassicRecipeSearchView(RecipeSearchView):
entry_query = simplesearch.get_query(query_string, ['summary', 'description'])
qs2 = init_qs.filter(entry_query).order_by(*order_by)
qs = list(chain(qs1, qs2))
qs = list(utils.chain_unique(qs1, qs2))
else:
if 'q' in self.request.GET:
qs = init_qs.order_by('pn', 'layerbranch__layer')