Added SPDX identifiers to all .py files except those in migrations directory.
Fixes: [YOCTO #13527]
Signed-off-by: Meh Mbeh Ida Delphine <idadelm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <bluelightning@bluelightning.org>
Removed all obsolete references to django.core.urlresolvers. Added the
newly required on_delete fields to foreign key relationships in models.py
and in all migrations.
Signed-off-by: Amber Elliot <amber.n.elliot@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <bluelightning@bluelightning.org>
Add an extra tool that lets you view all of the recipe dependencies in
a layer. There is also a mode that shows only cross-layer dependencies,
which can be useful to find dependencies on recipes in other layers
that aren't declared in the layer's dependencies (or conversely where a
layer dependency is no longer necessary).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
For the purposes of the branch comparison function I'm about to add it
would be useful to track the value of SRCREV, so we can see if it has
changed even if PV hasn't.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This change is to record PE (epoch) and PR (release) values for recipes.
These values will be reflected in the REST API but will not be exposed
in the UI. The aim of this change is to enrich metadata availability to
consumers of the feed.
Signed-off-by: Pranay Mankad <pranaymankad@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Record the configure script options when importing recipe / package
information so we can display them.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
There's a little more to patch handling in spec files than "patchX:"
fields - the patch actually has to be applied in the %prep section as
well, though this can take one of several forms (%autosetup / %autopatch
which apply all patches, individual %patchX directives, or even direct
application (rare). There's also the matter of the striplevel (-p option
to the patch command). Add fields to record whether or not a patch is
applied and the striplevel.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We don't actually need this for anything at the moment, but it would be
useful if we get to the point where we need to access imported files
within the application after the import process (e.g. to compare
patches).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Allow us to record a checksum for local sources (and potentially remote
ones if it is recorded in the recipe). This just adds the field, but
doesn't populate it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add the ability to mark each patch with a disposition indicating whether
the patch is interesting or not.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add user security questions upon registration as extra authentication
for password reset. Three unique security questions must be chosen and
answered. Answers are then stored in the database with the same hashing
algorithm as the users's password.
On password reset, users get two chances to get two out of three
security questions answered correctly. After a second failure their
account is locked and email is sent to the admin. The same template is
shown for the axes lockout. Super user cannot reset their password until
they set security questions.
Users can update their security questions or add them if they weren't
originally set (in the case of super user) in Edit Profile.
Signed-off-by: Amber Elliot <amber.n.elliot@intel.com>
Patches often need to be applied in a specific order. For OE recipes we
were always storing the Patch objects correct order as they are
refreshed every time the recipe itself is refreshed, however for other
distro comparisons, import_otherdistro.py attempts to preserve existing
records, adds new ones and then deletes whatever is left over, which may
result in the order getting messed up over time. To avoid this issue,
record the order next to the patch and set the model meta-info to use
this to sort Patch queries by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's not too common but there are instances where people have copied
.inc files into their own layer and modified them, and if you are using
such a layer that could result in unexpected behaviour. In order to get
a handle on when this is being done, collect data about all .inc files
and show duplicates in the Duplicates screen.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
When we print a warning about the value of a CharField being truncated,
print out the string representation of the object so we have a chance of
finding the offending object.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If a distro comparison update task fails (returning a non-zero value to
indicate as such) we were not able to see this easily from the frontend.
Show success/failure in the form of a label on the task page and general
update list/detail, and if the task fails while we're watching then make
the progress bar go red as well. Also make a distinction between the
process failing (retcode > 0) and being terminated (retcode < 0, e.g.
process was killed).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
In a bunch of places we needed to get the branch we were supposed to
be checking out (which is actual_branch if that is set, otherwise the
normal branch name). Add a function to do that.
Additionally, instead of showing the normal branch name next to the
"last update" date, use the result of this new function.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
When showing the error/warning counts for update records we need to
include any errors/warnings that are shown only in the main update log,
so we need to adjust how these are collected. Use a function rather than
pure aggregation to give a bit more control, and a {% with ... %} block
in the template to avoid the functions being called more than necessary.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make layerupdate collection slightly more reliable and make it easier
to see when updates have actually been captured:
* Split layerbranch into separate layer and branch fields, since there
may not be a layerbranch in existence but we might want to log an
error relating to the branch and layer.
* Show all layerupdates on the update detail page, not just those with
log messages
* Record before and after revisions and show these in the update detail
and layerupdate detail (with links)
* Record return code of update_layer process
* Highlight layer updates with a non-zero return code, errors or
warnings in the output on the update detail page
* Show duration on the layerupdate detail page
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
On the recipe detail page we provide a link to the actual recipe file
for reference purposes. However, for recipes that include a common .inc
file, many of the definitions of variable values will be inside the
.inc, therefore if you just look at the recipe you won't see the full
picture. Of course you can just go up to the parent directory in the
repository web interface, but for convenience's sake add links to any
files that are included/required by the recipe that are adjacent to
the recipe itself. (We already have the data in the form of the
RecipeFileDependency records that are intended to ensure we know when
the recipe needs to be updated if one of the files it includes changes).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Specifying the covering recipe in the comparison recipe detail page was
always a bit awkward - you could only type the name, if you wanted to
actually find a recipe or look up the currently selected one's details
then you had to open another browser tab/window. To fix this, replace
the form on the comparison recipe detail page with a side-by-side
display of the covering recipe's information, along with a button that
lets you search and then select the covering recipe and at the same time
enter comments or set any of the other cover fields.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we're collecting this useful info we should really display it. Try to
make the link clickable if possible.
At the same time, add the layerbranch to the list display for Source
objects in the admin site.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Comparison updates might involve some custom fetch process, so provide a
mechanism to register these via settings.py on a per-branch basis. If
an update command is defined for a branch and the logged-in user has the
new "update_comparison_branch" permission, an "Update" button will show
up on the recipes page for the comparison branch for authenticated
users that will trigger the command in the background (as a celery job)
and then show a page that displays the status. The status isn't shown in
real-time since that requires quite a lot of plumbing, but the page at
least auto-refreshes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make it clearer what this field is for (it should be set for every
comparison layer, so that they don't show up in places they shouldn't).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If other distro comparison package(s) exist for a recipe being shown in
the RRS recipe detail page, link to the page for each package as well as
any extra URLs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a structure that lets you define a template URL per layer to be
shown per comparison recipe. For example, you could use this to define a
URL template to link to the upstream summary page for the package (e.g.
Fedora's page for the acl package is at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/acl, so you would use
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/%pn% as the template and then
this would be shown for every package).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a flag that can be set and searched for to indicate that we need to
take care of importing a package or a patch applied by a package.
Ideally the comments would elaborate on what's needed (if it's not
obvious from the cover status).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script to import "recipe" information from other distro metadata,
based on the import_classic.py script. At the moment, this assumes a
directory where each subdirectory is a package directory containing a
spec file; this would be suitable for distributions such as Fedora
assuming you have all of the package repos checked out locally. Since
you can add additional information to these records (the cover fields
pointing to matching recipes), existing records are updated rather than
deleting everything and re-importing, and we only mark records as
deleted rather than actually deleting them (in case you accidentally
point the script at an empty directory or similar).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Turn the existing OE-Classic support into something a bit more
generic so we can import data from other distributions and compare it to
what we have in layers.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add the ability to show a notice at the top of every page; this provides
the ability for admins to display a message to visitors in the case of
infrastructure or index data issues. Notices can have an expiry date and
can be disabled and re-enabled if needed. A subset of HTML can be used
for formatting the text, URLs will be made into clickable links, and
four "levels" are supported (info, success, warning and error).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's a bit of a pain to have to set the two python environment fields on
every record in order to have things set correctly, and it can easily
get forgotten, so try to set them automatically by default (assuming
reasonable naming).
Note that this does introduce an annoying behaviour whereby if you click
"Add another Maintenance plan layer branch" and then decide you don't
want it, the admin form will insist you fill in the fields unless you
clear out the python2/3 environment fields. I'm not sure how to fix
that, so I'm leaving it as-is for now.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Collect information about patches applied by a recipe, and record each
patch along with the upstream status, presenting them in the recipe
detail.
Implements [YOCTO #7909].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It would be useful in some scenarios to get the complete list of
recursive dependencies for a layer, so add a function to do that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The Recipe Reporting System needs to be able to provide links to commits
in the web interface for the repository, but we can only do this if we
have a custom template URL just like we do for file/tree links, since
it's different for different git web interfaces. Add support in all the
various places for such a URL and make use of it in the RRS.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Save each remote SRC_URI so we can use these for the recipe reporting
system. This replaces an earlier implementation in the rrs branch where
we simply stored SRC_URI verbatim.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The old RRS branch had its own addition of dependency support, but in the
mean time we added that to the layer index in the master branch using a
different structure. Adapt the RRS recipe detail page to that structure.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If you use a traditional database engine (such as MySQL/MariaDB) then
maximum character field lengths are enforced, however depending on the
configuration this may result in an exception rather than a warning and
truncation and will also break the per-layer transaction. To avoid that
ugliness, add a signal handler to do it internally, which as a bonus
lets us know if field lenghts are too short for data when using database
engines that don't enforce lengths (e.g. SQLite).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Added a model for the PACKAGECONFIG variable, which has a one to
many relationship with the Recipe model.
Added models for static build dependencies and dynamic build
dependencies, both of which have a many to many relationship with
the Recipe model.
These objects are created in update_layer.py and are displayed on the
Recipe detail page.
Added a depends search option for recipes, allowing users to search for
recipes that depend on any particular recipe. Use "depends:recipename"
in the recipe search to activate this.
Fixes [YOCTO #12129]
Fixes [YOCTO #11415]
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's really irritating to be forced to specify a value for this field
especially as it'll get auto-populated by the update script. Set
blank=True to allow that. While we're at it, touch up the description a
bit to make more sense.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Allow admin to create Yocto Project versions with the version name,
description, an icon link that represents that version, and a link that
contains more information about the version.
Admins who have the "set_yp_compatibility" permission can then
decide if a layer has Yocto Project compatible certification,
and if it does, admin can choose which version of Yocto Project
the layer is compatible with. If a layer is deemed compatible,
the version's icon will appear next to the layer's name, and
the icon be a clickable link to a page with more information.
Fixes [YOCTO #11452]
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a status for a layer indicating it should not be updated. I don't
expect this to be widely used (and is only settable from the admin
interface) but would be useful if you have a legacy sub-layer that you
want to prevent from being visible on certain branches - it will prevent
the update script from doing anything with the layer and thus avoid
branch records from being auto-created on branches where you've deleted
it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make minor (non-structural) improvements to the model, mostly for the
benefit of the admin interface:
* Set default ordering so that branches appear in the same order they do
in the user-facing drop-down
* Include the description in the default string representation (so you
know which branch name matches with which Yocto Project version, in
the OE index).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
At the moment it's a bit difficult to get update logs out of the
environment in which the update script is being run. In order to make
the logs more accessible, create a LayerUpdate model to record the
output of update_layer.py separately for each layerbranch and tie the
created LayerUpdates together with a single Update model per session.
We provide two ways to look at this - a Tools->Updates page for
logged-in users, and there's also an "Updates" tab on each layer that is
accessible to anyone; which one is useful depends on whether you are
looking at the index as a whole or an individual layer.
Update records older than 30 days are deleted automatically by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Sometimes people put values that aren't URLs into the HOMEPAGE variable.
If that's the case, then we should not turn that value into a link which
will be invalid.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
