We check out different revisions while we do this processing, and so
does the layer index update script, so we shouldn't be allowing both to
run at once or nasty stuff will happen.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Since we're now executing a separate script per commit, we should try
not to do that unless the commit actually touches recipe files in order
to avoid wasting time.
(Whilst it's possible that a change to a bbclass might alter what's in
the recipe, we can ignore that since we are only concerned with actual
upgrades which would always require some sort of change to the recipe or
an include file, so we can safely skip commits that don't do that.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Instead of arbitrarily importing the last 8 days of upgrades, record the
date and commit when we do an import, and then use that information the
next time the script is run.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We should expect multiple matches for layerbranch + pn, so use filter()
instead of get() and take the first id that matches.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We're calling translate() on the string deep in the bowels of the
parsing code and that doesn't work well if the string is unicode, so
convert it to a plain string first. That won't work well if the filename
is unicode but the chances of that with a recipe is pretty small I would
think.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Use try...finally to ensure we shut down tinfoil, but since we are
potentially dealing with older bitbake releases when importing older
upgrades, only call shutdown() if it's actually there (and although it's
unlikely, guard against the broken shutdown() in fido as we do in the
main layer index update script).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If you want to go back and get history for the earlier releases (krogoth
and previous) then we need to be able to support both python 2 and 3,
which practically means we need the same split for this script as we
have for the main layer index update script.
The catch here is that since we are going back and following the history
of changes forward, we basically need to use the same version of bitbake
that was current at that time. This works except for around the
transition between python 2 to 3 where the metadata lagged behind a bit,
so we need to take that into account. In order to keep things generic we
have a date field on the maintenance plan layer branch that specifies
the date in the metadata where we should switch over to python 3, and
then link to PythonEnvironment records that should be used for python 2
and 3 respectively.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The old RRS branch had its own addition of dependency support, but in the
mean time we added that to the layer index in the master branch using a
different structure. Adapt the RRS recipe detail page to that structure.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If the RRS is enabled, then add a way to get from the layer detail page
to any maintenance plans in which the layer is included.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Fixtures aren't supported in current Django versions. Add some code to
the initial migration to add the data instead.
Also add releases/milestones up to and including 2.5.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We were passing in a parameter value but not using that in the query.
Add a WHERE clause to fix that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Table names should be lowercase. I'm unsure if the collation settings
have an effect on this, but with the mariadb database I set up here I
needed to make this change or else I got errors about missing tables.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we call objects.get() with no matching record then the result will be
an exception, not a null return, so handle that properly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
With Django 1.10+, if you use get_template() to retrieve a template,
then you can't pass a context when calling .render() on it, you need to
pass a dict instead.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Use maintenance plans to get layerbranches
* Use from/to/subject and admin contact from maintenance plan
* Use an actual template to render the email (and drop tabulate
dependency)
* Improve grammar in the email text
* Use a single line to represent the most recent commit
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Add a flag to say whether emails should be sent
* Add fields for from/to/subject (to replace what's currently in
settings)
* Add user link for administrator to replace the hardcoded values in the
email template
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This function is no longer needed - we now rely upon the layer index's
code to do this (update through the update script, and checkout through
setup_layer()).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Remove hardcoded references to the poky repository, and process
layerbranches for all enabled maintenance plans.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Without this it's not clear what's happening if debug mode is enabled
and you are waiting for the parsing step.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If the Recipe object doesn't exist here then an exception will be raised
rather than None being returned, and this will also trigger if multiple
recipes match. This may have never triggered in the past because this
would have been run right after updating all the recipes in the layer and
clearing out duplicates (which we were doing earlier), and thus what is
in the database would match the recipe files in the repository, assuming
no errors occurred during parsing). We can't remove duplicates though so
we need to switch over to using filter() and taking the first recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Remove hardcoded references to the poky repository, and process
layerbranches for all enabled maintenance plans.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This is never going to work, the only way we can practically do parallel
execution is to run these things in a task which would basically amount
to distrodata's do_checkpkg; we may move to that in future but for now
just drop the threading code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Instead of hardcoded references to the poky repository, look for any
maintainers.inc file in layers associated with the layerbranches for all
enabled maintenance plans. At present few layers have this file, but at
least it will now work generically in any layer index instance.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Sometimes we get back UTF-8 characters (particularly when picking up
names from git commits), and the ascii codec will error out if that
happens, so switch over to utf-8.
We can as a result remove the decode() calls from the bulk change view.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Instead of processing all layerbranches, only process those associated
with an enabled maintenance plan. This is one step towards being able to
use the RRS together with a more general layer index database.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We don't need to create branches here, and we don't need to actually
check anything out unless we're going to parse, so we can save a bit of
time by not doing so.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If any Releases exist then we create a default MaintenancePlan and then
link all Releases to it - this needs to be done in multiple upgrade
steps since the field needs to be non-null.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The MaintenancePlan will provide some context for the RRS records so we
can effectively enable RRS functionality only on certain layers where we
want it. You can also consider the maintenance of multiple layers
together under a single plan if desired.
Here we add just the MaintenancePlan and the corresponding migration;
a non-null link from the Release requires a separate migration and thus
that will be done in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This is of course a new Django migration rather than the previous South
one. This will have to be applied using --fake-initial on a database
that already has the RRS tables.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add the ability to run the scripts without writing changes back to the
database, for debugging purposes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we're integrating the layer index and the RRS, no need to jump off to
the OE index if for example this is an internal index.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We can't just delete arbitrary recipes that do exist in the layer if
we're in a general layer index database. We'll need to handle this in a
different way, or just live with the fact that there will be duplicate
entries.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Due to bitbake client/server changes now the meta path isn't included
to sys.path when load tinfoil.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
