If an exception occurred during the update then we were managing to save
the update record, but we did not include the exception traceback in the
log for the update. Catch the exception and log it which ensures it gets
captured in the update record and still gets printed as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make layerupdate collection slightly more reliable and make it easier
to see when updates have actually been captured:
* Split layerbranch into separate layer and branch fields, since there
may not be a layerbranch in existence but we might want to log an
error relating to the branch and layer.
* Show all layerupdates on the update detail page, not just those with
log messages
* Record before and after revisions and show these in the update detail
and layerupdate detail (with links)
* Record return code of update_layer process
* Highlight layer updates with a non-zero return code, errors or
warnings in the output on the update detail page
* Show duration on the layerupdate detail page
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
When an exception occurs during the main part of update_layer, we were
catching and printing it but that's not enough - we need to do the
following as well:
* Use logger.error() to print the exception information, so that it gets
logged and highlighted as an error in the layer update
* Exit with a non-zero return code so that update.py knows it has failed
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If for some reason update_layer.py does not print out the values we
expect then we shouldn't be throwing a traceback, we should be handling
it gracefully - i.e., print an error and then move on to the next layer.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
On the recipe detail page we provide a link to the actual recipe file
for reference purposes. However, for recipes that include a common .inc
file, many of the definitions of variable values will be inside the
.inc, therefore if you just look at the recipe you won't see the full
picture. Of course you can just go up to the parent directory in the
repository web interface, but for convenience's sake add links to any
files that are included/required by the recipe that are adjacent to
the recipe itself. (We already have the data in the form of the
RecipeFileDependency records that are intended to ensure we know when
the recipe needs to be updated if one of the files it includes changes).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Specifying the covering recipe in the comparison recipe detail page was
always a bit awkward - you could only type the name, if you wanted to
actually find a recipe or look up the currently selected one's details
then you had to open another browser tab/window. To fix this, replace
the form on the comparison recipe detail page with a side-by-side
display of the covering recipe's information, along with a button that
lets you search and then select the covering recipe and at the same time
enter comments or set any of the other cover fields.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we're collecting this useful info we should really display it. Try to
make the link clickable if possible.
At the same time, add the layerbranch to the list display for Source
objects in the admin site.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script to fetch package sources from Fedora's Pagure
infrastructure site at https://src.fedoraproject.org/, based upon
github-fetch.py (I broke out the internal fetch function with the intent
to share it with that other script, however I didn't in the end as I
wanted the scripts to remain independent).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script to fetch/update all repositories within a GitHub
organisation. Note that to run this you will need an access token, which
you can create by going to GitHub and then
Settings -> Developer Settings -> Personal access tokens.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Comparison updates might involve some custom fetch process, so provide a
mechanism to register these via settings.py on a per-branch basis. If
an update command is defined for a branch and the logged-in user has the
new "update_comparison_branch" permission, an "Update" button will show
up on the recipes page for the comparison branch for authenticated
users that will trigger the command in the background (as a celery job)
and then show a page that displays the status. The status isn't shown in
real-time since that requires quite a lot of plumbing, but the page at
least auto-refreshes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make it clearer what this field is for (it should be set for every
comparison layer, so that they don't show up in places they shouldn't).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If other distro comparison package(s) exist for a recipe being shown in
the RRS recipe detail page, link to the page for each package as well as
any extra URLs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a structure that lets you define a template URL per layer to be
shown per comparison recipe. For example, you could use this to define a
URL template to link to the upstream summary page for the package (e.g.
Fedora's page for the acl package is at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/acl, so you would use
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/%pn% as the template and then
this would be shown for every package).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add the ability to export the comparison search results to CSV format in
order to allow importing the data into external tools.
Note: I implemented this in a different way than the earlier recipe CSV
export, i.e. it uses a template to render the CSV instead of a
function-based view with the Python csv module - the reason for this is
we can reuse the same view as we use for producing the search, with all
of the flexibility that gives us.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
When doing the reversed query it's often desirable to exclude recipes
by inherited class, for example those that inherit the packagegroup,
image and meta classes as they don't actually build anything and thus
aren't going to match up with anything in the other distribution.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Provide a lazy-loaded popup for selecting layers to include in the query
instead of having it as a simple drop-down, so you can select more than
one layer.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Enable "reversing" the comparison, so you can see which recipes on the
OE side match up (or don't) with the other distro. The filtering for
this is a bit awkward, since we don't have an actual foreign key for the
link, hence the hairiness of the code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add support for importing package information extracted from a running
Debian system (i.e. from the output of apt-cache show "*").
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a flag that can be set and searched for to indicate that we need to
take care of importing a package or a patch applied by a package.
Ideally the comments would elaborate on what's needed (if it's not
obvious from the cover status).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Packages with the "Not available" status were inexplicably excluded from
the graph, include them.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Allow searching on:
* Any "available" status (i.e. other than "Unknown" or "Not available")
* Whether the package has patches or not
* What the covering layer is (assuming there is one).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's a bit crude, but accept '' or "" as meaning search for entries
with an empty category.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add an option to skip certain recipes by name (a crude workaround for
when we would otherwise get an erroneous match).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If the source URL is fetching from pypi then we know it's python;
similarly cpan means perl.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we always set cover_pn if there is a match rather than only setting
it if it's different from pn then it simplifies the code elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Only apply OE-Classic-specific logic after checking that it's actually
OE-Classic
* Ignore recipes marked deleted
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script to import "recipe" information from other distro metadata,
based on the import_classic.py script. At the moment, this assumes a
directory where each subdirectory is a package directory containing a
spec file; this would be suitable for distributions such as Fedora
assuming you have all of the package repos checked out locally. Since
you can add additional information to these records (the cover fields
pointing to matching recipes), existing records are updated rather than
deleting everything and re-importing, and we only mark records as
deleted rather than actually deleting them (in case you accidentally
point the script at an empty directory or similar).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Turn the existing OE-Classic support into something a bit more
generic so we can import data from other distributions and compare it to
what we have in layers.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We were sorting the layers in the wrong order when trying to choose
which layer to pick a matching recipe from - it needs to be descending
priority order, not ascending.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script that uses the REST API to gather information from another
running layer index instance (e.g. layers.openembedded.org) and import
that into the local index. Only information for branches that are
already set up is imported, and only manually entered information -
no recipes, machines, etc.
Partially implements [YOCTO #9760].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If the cover status for a comparison recipe is Unknown, Not available,
or Distro-specific, then we disable the recipe and layerbranch fields in
the form (using Javascript), however the form could still be saved and
any existing values would persist. Clear out the fields upon saving if
they are set under these circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Add a few items
* Merge the top feature lines with the bottom ones
* Drop an item that has basically been satisfied by way of the REST API
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If there are errors we need to close the div or it'll expand to
encompass all of the remaining fields in the form.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Check if bitbake directory can be found before trying to do anything
with the repo
* Split try..finally into two so we don't try to shut down a nonexistent
tinfoil when we failed to gain a lock.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We weren't giving the layersapp container access to the layer
repositories, which meant that the "Bulk change" function (which lets
you generate patches on top of recipes to change certain variable
values) could not work. Enable the volume and rearrange the order so
that it does, and name the volume more appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Several distro-provided versions of Docker I have used are too old to
support the --mount option, so rather than making users find and replace
it in the instructions, just revert to the old-style -v option.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The Docker-based setup method is preferred for production, so rearrange
things a little to make it a bit easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The home directory path in the commented line here had not been updated
when we switched to running the app as a normal user ("layers"), so do
that now. Additionally we need to copy the file *after* we create the
user, otherwise the home directory will be created by the COPY operation
first and will thus end up being owned by root which we don't want.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Docker commits changes after each RUN stage and commands that delete
files must part of the sane RUN command to actually reduce image size.
Debian stretch contains pip 9.0.3 and the upgrade to 10 caused pip
install to fail.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Scherer <Konrad.Scherer@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Put NGINX, Celery, and RabbitMQ into their own separate containers
* Use a docker network instead of the deprecated --link
* Allow for collecting the static files properly
* Create a copy of settings.py specifically for the docker setup. This
will need to be kept in sync with the main example settings.py, but
it avoids the user having to edit it too much.
* Add optional SSL configuration using letsencrypt certificate
* Create some volumes for static files / fetched repos
* Add some more helpful setup instructions
Largely based upon work by Michael Halstead <michael@yoctoproject.org>.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we're starting a new database, or one of the other applications
(i.e. dependencies of the main layerindex application) has been
upgraded, we need to be migrate all of the applications rather than just
layerindex, so have migrate.sh do that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's best practice to run as a normal account, so create one and use it.
Thanks to Michael Halstead <michael@yoctoproject.org> for this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
