On the recipe detail page we provide a link to the actual recipe file
for reference purposes. However, for recipes that include a common .inc
file, many of the definitions of variable values will be inside the
.inc, therefore if you just look at the recipe you won't see the full
picture. Of course you can just go up to the parent directory in the
repository web interface, but for convenience's sake add links to any
files that are included/required by the recipe that are adjacent to
the recipe itself. (We already have the data in the form of the
RecipeFileDependency records that are intended to ensure we know when
the recipe needs to be updated if one of the files it includes changes).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Specifying the covering recipe in the comparison recipe detail page was
always a bit awkward - you could only type the name, if you wanted to
actually find a recipe or look up the currently selected one's details
then you had to open another browser tab/window. To fix this, replace
the form on the comparison recipe detail page with a side-by-side
display of the covering recipe's information, along with a button that
lets you search and then select the covering recipe and at the same time
enter comments or set any of the other cover fields.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If we're collecting this useful info we should really display it. Try to
make the link clickable if possible.
At the same time, add the layerbranch to the list display for Source
objects in the admin site.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Comparison updates might involve some custom fetch process, so provide a
mechanism to register these via settings.py on a per-branch basis. If
an update command is defined for a branch and the logged-in user has the
new "update_comparison_branch" permission, an "Update" button will show
up on the recipes page for the comparison branch for authenticated
users that will trigger the command in the background (as a celery job)
and then show a page that displays the status. The status isn't shown in
real-time since that requires quite a lot of plumbing, but the page at
least auto-refreshes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make it clearer what this field is for (it should be set for every
comparison layer, so that they don't show up in places they shouldn't).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If other distro comparison package(s) exist for a recipe being shown in
the RRS recipe detail page, link to the page for each package as well as
any extra URLs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a structure that lets you define a template URL per layer to be
shown per comparison recipe. For example, you could use this to define a
URL template to link to the upstream summary page for the package (e.g.
Fedora's page for the acl package is at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/acl, so you would use
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/%pn% as the template and then
this would be shown for every package).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a flag that can be set and searched for to indicate that we need to
take care of importing a package or a patch applied by a package.
Ideally the comments would elaborate on what's needed (if it's not
obvious from the cover status).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script to import "recipe" information from other distro metadata,
based on the import_classic.py script. At the moment, this assumes a
directory where each subdirectory is a package directory containing a
spec file; this would be suitable for distributions such as Fedora
assuming you have all of the package repos checked out locally. Since
you can add additional information to these records (the cover fields
pointing to matching recipes), existing records are updated rather than
deleting everything and re-importing, and we only mark records as
deleted rather than actually deleting them (in case you accidentally
point the script at an empty directory or similar).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Turn the existing OE-Classic support into something a bit more
generic so we can import data from other distributions and compare it to
what we have in layers.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add the ability to show a notice at the top of every page; this provides
the ability for admins to display a message to visitors in the case of
infrastructure or index data issues. Notices can have an expiry date and
can be disabled and re-enabled if needed. A subset of HTML can be used
for formatting the text, URLs will be made into clickable links, and
four "levels" are supported (info, success, warning and error).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's a bit of a pain to have to set the two python environment fields on
every record in order to have things set correctly, and it can easily
get forgotten, so try to set them automatically by default (assuming
reasonable naming).
Note that this does introduce an annoying behaviour whereby if you click
"Add another Maintenance plan layer branch" and then decide you don't
want it, the admin form will insist you fill in the fields unless you
clear out the python2/3 environment fields. I'm not sure how to fix
that, so I'm leaving it as-is for now.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Collect information about patches applied by a recipe, and record each
patch along with the upstream status, presenting them in the recipe
detail.
Implements [YOCTO #7909].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It would be useful in some scenarios to get the complete list of
recursive dependencies for a layer, so add a function to do that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The Recipe Reporting System needs to be able to provide links to commits
in the web interface for the repository, but we can only do this if we
have a custom template URL just like we do for file/tree links, since
it's different for different git web interfaces. Add support in all the
various places for such a URL and make use of it in the RRS.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Save each remote SRC_URI so we can use these for the recipe reporting
system. This replaces an earlier implementation in the rrs branch where
we simply stored SRC_URI verbatim.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
The old RRS branch had its own addition of dependency support, but in the
mean time we added that to the layer index in the master branch using a
different structure. Adapt the RRS recipe detail page to that structure.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If you use a traditional database engine (such as MySQL/MariaDB) then
maximum character field lengths are enforced, however depending on the
configuration this may result in an exception rather than a warning and
truncation and will also break the per-layer transaction. To avoid that
ugliness, add a signal handler to do it internally, which as a bonus
lets us know if field lenghts are too short for data when using database
engines that don't enforce lengths (e.g. SQLite).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Added a model for the PACKAGECONFIG variable, which has a one to
many relationship with the Recipe model.
Added models for static build dependencies and dynamic build
dependencies, both of which have a many to many relationship with
the Recipe model.
These objects are created in update_layer.py and are displayed on the
Recipe detail page.
Added a depends search option for recipes, allowing users to search for
recipes that depend on any particular recipe. Use "depends:recipename"
in the recipe search to activate this.
Fixes [YOCTO #12129]
Fixes [YOCTO #11415]
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
It's really irritating to be forced to specify a value for this field
especially as it'll get auto-populated by the update script. Set
blank=True to allow that. While we're at it, touch up the description a
bit to make more sense.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Allow admin to create Yocto Project versions with the version name,
description, an icon link that represents that version, and a link that
contains more information about the version.
Admins who have the "set_yp_compatibility" permission can then
decide if a layer has Yocto Project compatible certification,
and if it does, admin can choose which version of Yocto Project
the layer is compatible with. If a layer is deemed compatible,
the version's icon will appear next to the layer's name, and
the icon be a clickable link to a page with more information.
Fixes [YOCTO #11452]
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a status for a layer indicating it should not be updated. I don't
expect this to be widely used (and is only settable from the admin
interface) but would be useful if you have a legacy sub-layer that you
want to prevent from being visible on certain branches - it will prevent
the update script from doing anything with the layer and thus avoid
branch records from being auto-created on branches where you've deleted
it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Make minor (non-structural) improvements to the model, mostly for the
benefit of the admin interface:
* Set default ordering so that branches appear in the same order they do
in the user-facing drop-down
* Include the description in the default string representation (so you
know which branch name matches with which Yocto Project version, in
the OE index).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
At the moment it's a bit difficult to get update logs out of the
environment in which the update script is being run. In order to make
the logs more accessible, create a LayerUpdate model to record the
output of update_layer.py separately for each layerbranch and tie the
created LayerUpdates together with a single Update model per session.
We provide two ways to look at this - a Tools->Updates page for
logged-in users, and there's also an "Updates" tab on each layer that is
accessible to anyone; which one is useful depends on whether you are
looking at the index as a whole or an individual layer.
Update records older than 30 days are deleted automatically by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Sometimes people put values that aren't URLs into the HOMEPAGE variable.
If that's the case, then we should not turn that value into a link which
will be invalid.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Parse layer.conf and add dependencies that are not required from
LAYERRECOMMENDS_<name>. Update the layerindex/template to support
recommends. Uses bitbake parsing code & checks versions.
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@WindRiver.com>
Added associated migration.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Collection and version will be pulled from the layer.conf if it exists
and dependencies will be resolved by first checking for layers with the
dependency name and then checking for collections.
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@WindRiver.com>
Added associated migration.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Add the distros to the index. This looks a lot like the machines
and allows users to search for a particular distro.
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@WindRiver.com>
Added associated migration.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
The updated field on the branch table was not null and this breaks the
fixture. It's too painful to specify a value for a datetime field in a
fixture json file and it wouldn't even make sense to specify a value in
this case anyway, so just allow the field to be null.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Django 1.8 does not allow DateFields that have both auto_now and default
set - since they are mutually exclusive; if you have auto_now you don't
need a default.
Part of the implementation for [YOCTO #9620].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a model to support setting a python command and virtualenv per
branch, which allows you to parse master with python3 and krogoth with
python2 for example.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We need to be able to support Python 3 so that we can parse master of
OE-Core with bitbake (which now requires it). This now means the
interface itself and the update script require Python 3.4+.
Part of the implementation for [YOCTO #9704].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Fix "data truncated" warnings/errors when loading data for OE-Core:
* PROVIDES for recipe packagegroup-base is ~1452 characters
* LICENSE for recipe linux-firmware is ~1053 characters
(These aren't shown with SQLite, only with something like MariaDB where
column sizes are enforced.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Allow updating multiple branches, and if no branches are specified,
update all branches that have a new "updates_enabled" flag field set to
True. This avoids the need to have a separate shell script which runs
update.py for each branch (and thus has hardcoded knowledge of each
active branch in the index, i.e. it needs to be kept up-to-date in
addition to the database.)
The migration will default updates_enabled to True for all branches so
if you wish to take advantage of this functionality, the flag will need
to be set to False for any branches that shouldn't be updated.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
If you're moving a short description value from DESCRIPTION to SUMMARY
then part of that is setting DESCRIPTION to blank, however that wasn't
possible - the code was assuming that a null value meant "keep the
original value". Change the logic so that the value in the bulk change
object is always set and is compared to the original value to see if it
is different. This provides less safety against bulk change data going
stale in the face of the metadata being updated, but without using an
additional "magic" field value that's the price we have to pay, and it's
unlikely to bother too many people I would imagine.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Display blacklist information for recipes in the recipe details,
as well as the recipe search page, and layer page tables. This
information is pulled from the PNBLACKLIST variable. Includes a
hover text containing the reason for blacklist labels.
Changes to Django and Layerindex files:
- models.py, update.py
- migration file
- templates and static content (stylesheet)
[YOCTO #7855]
Signed-off-by: Alex Franco <alejandro.franco@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Smith <elliot.smith@intel.com>
To identify image recipes and provide inheritance data for recipes, an
inherits field was added to the recipe model, and then populated using
refactored data from __inherit_cache. Finally the field was also added
to page templates, along with style changes proposed in attachment, and
an additional style change to display the inherits field as a list in
detailed view. The field skips globally inherited data as proposed.
[YOCTO #7575]
Signed-off-by: Alex Franco <alejandro.franco@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add default = datetime.now attr to updated field of Branch
model because it fails when try to insert inital data with NULL.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
We add an automatically-updateing "updated" datetime
field to Branch, LayerItem, LayerBranch, Recipe and
Machine models to allow date-based incremental updates
through the API.
The added field does not interfere with the existing
form-based pages (auto_now sets editable to false).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru DAMIAN <alexandru.damian@intel.com>
If there is a % character in the path to a file / directory, we need to
properly encode it when creating the repo web URL or the link won't
work. Thanks to Khem Raj for reporting this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
With BSPs being "retired" e.g. in meta-intel, it is possible for layers
to not exist on the master branch; since this is legitimate we need the
layer index to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Recipes without versions in the file name (such as alsa-state.bb)
weren't having their bbappends listed. Use a regex match to fix this.
* Use the prefix from the filename instead of PN, since that's how
BitBake does it
* List version matching bbappends first, then non-matching in muted
colour
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
We always need to replace %path% in the URL, not just when there is a
non-blank path to replace it with.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
* Drop the front page - this just gets in the way. Redirect to the
layers list instead. This has meant adding a touch more text to the
about page and adding the FAQ link to the footer.
* Use a separate navbar to hold the branch selector and the main
top-level pages (Layers, Recipes, Machines) instead of tabs
* All pages depending on a branch selection are now under
branch/<branchname>/ so we don't need to have the branch selection on
every page.
* Use breadcrumbs on recipe detail and layer detail pages instead of
tabs
* Add title to recipe detail page
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Add a script for doing a one-time import of OE-Classic recipe
information, so comparisons against OE-Core can be performed; this
is stored using a new ClassicRecipe model supporting additional fields
for tracking migration status. The migration status fields can be
updated as well as viewed and summarised in graph format.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
This provides a way to set "meta" fields (SUMMARY, DESCRIPTION,
HOMEPAGE, BUGTRACKER, SECTION, and LICENSE) for a number of recipes at
once, and then download those changes in the form of one or more patch
files which can be submitted for merging into the layer.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Some layers don't use the conventional branch name (i.e. the same name
as the core branch). Add a field so we can record the actual branch name
and use this within the update script.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
