mirror of
https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx.git
synced 2025-07-07 18:05:21 +02:00
wifi: mac80211: fix BA session teardown race
[ Upstream commit05f136220d
] As previously reported by Alexander, whose commit69403bad97
("wifi: mac80211: sdata can be NULL during AMPDU start") I'm reverting as part of this commit, there's a race between station destruction and aggregation setup, where the aggregation setup can happen while the station is being removed and queue the work after ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() has already run in __sta_info_destroy_part1(), and thus the worker will run with a now freed station. In his case, this manifested in a NULL sdata pointer, but really there's no guarantee whatsoever. The real issue seems to be that it's possible at all to have a situation where this occurs - we want to stop the BA sessions when doing _part1, but we cannot be sure, and WLAN_STA_BLOCK_BA isn't necessarily effective since we don't know that the setup isn't concurrently running and already got past the check. Simply call ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() again in the second part of station destruction, since at that point really nothing else can hold a reference to the station any more. Also revert the sdata checks since those are just misleading at this point. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
268f84a827
commit
86f22e7cce
|
@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ void ieee80211_tx_ba_session_handle_start(struct sta_info *sta, int tid)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct tid_ampdu_tx *tid_tx;
|
struct tid_ampdu_tx *tid_tx;
|
||||||
struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->local;
|
struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->local;
|
||||||
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
|
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = sta->sdata;
|
||||||
struct ieee80211_ampdu_params params = {
|
struct ieee80211_ampdu_params params = {
|
||||||
.sta = &sta->sta,
|
.sta = &sta->sta,
|
||||||
.action = IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_START,
|
.action = IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_START,
|
||||||
|
@ -525,7 +525,6 @@ void ieee80211_tx_ba_session_handle_start(struct sta_info *sta, int tid)
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
synchronize_net();
|
synchronize_net();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sdata = sta->sdata;
|
|
||||||
params.ssn = sta->tid_seq[tid] >> 4;
|
params.ssn = sta->tid_seq[tid] >> 4;
|
||||||
ret = drv_ampdu_action(local, sdata, ¶ms);
|
ret = drv_ampdu_action(local, sdata, ¶ms);
|
||||||
tid_tx->ssn = params.ssn;
|
tid_tx->ssn = params.ssn;
|
||||||
|
@ -539,9 +538,6 @@ void ieee80211_tx_ba_session_handle_start(struct sta_info *sta, int tid)
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
set_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_DRV_READY, &tid_tx->state);
|
set_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_DRV_READY, &tid_tx->state);
|
||||||
} else if (ret) {
|
} else if (ret) {
|
||||||
if (!sdata)
|
|
||||||
return;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ht_dbg(sdata,
|
ht_dbg(sdata,
|
||||||
"BA request denied - HW unavailable for %pM tid %d\n",
|
"BA request denied - HW unavailable for %pM tid %d\n",
|
||||||
sta->sta.addr, tid);
|
sta->sta.addr, tid);
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -393,9 +393,6 @@ int drv_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_local *local,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
might_sleep();
|
might_sleep();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!sdata)
|
|
||||||
return -EIO;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sdata = get_bss_sdata(sdata);
|
sdata = get_bss_sdata(sdata);
|
||||||
if (!check_sdata_in_driver(sdata))
|
if (!check_sdata_in_driver(sdata))
|
||||||
return -EIO;
|
return -EIO;
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1402,6 +1402,20 @@ static void __sta_info_destroy_part2(struct sta_info *sta, bool recalc)
|
||||||
* after _part1 and before _part2!
|
* after _part1 and before _part2!
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* There's a potential race in _part1 where we set WLAN_STA_BLOCK_BA
|
||||||
|
* but someone might have just gotten past a check, and not yet into
|
||||||
|
* queuing the work/creating the data/etc.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Do another round of destruction so that the worker is certainly
|
||||||
|
* canceled before we later free the station.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Since this is after synchronize_rcu()/synchronize_net() we're now
|
||||||
|
* certain that nobody can actually hold a reference to the STA and
|
||||||
|
* be calling e.g. ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session().
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions(sta, AGG_STOP_DESTROY_STA);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
might_sleep();
|
might_sleep();
|
||||||
lockdep_assert_held(&local->sta_mtx);
|
lockdep_assert_held(&local->sta_mtx);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user