[ Upstream commit e0a200ab4b ]
DisplayID spec v1.3 revision history notes do claim that
the toplogy block was added in v1.3 so requiring structure
v1.2 would seem correct, but there is at least one EDID in
edid.tv with a topology block and structure v1.0. And
there are also EDIDs with DisplayID structure v1.3 which
seems to be totally incorrect as DisplayID spec v1.3 lists
structure v1.2 as the only legal value.
Unfortunately I couldn't find copies of DisplayID spec
v1.0-v1.2 anywhere (even on vesa.org), so I'll have to
go on empirical evidence alone.
We used to parse the topology block on all v1.x
structures until the check for structure v2.0 was added.
Let's go back to doing that as the evidence does suggest
that there are DisplayIDs in the wild that would miss
out on the topology stuff otherwise.
Also toss out DISPLAY_ID_STRUCTURE_VER_12 entirely as
it doesn't appear we can really use it for anything.
I *think* we could technically skip all the structure
version checks as the block tags shouldn't conflict
between v2.0 and v1.x. But no harm in having a bit of
extra sanity checks I guess.
So far I'm not aware of any user reported regressions
from overly strict check, but I do know that it broke
igt/kms_tiled_display's fake DisplayID as that one
gets generated with structure v1.0.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Fixes: c5a486af9d ("drm/edid: parse Tiled Display Topology Data Block for DisplayID 2.0")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240410180139.21352-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The DisplayID structure version and primary use case are stored in the
DisplayID Base Section. We should be checking them in a number of places
when parsing the DisplayID blocks. Currently, we completely ignore the
primary use case, and just look at the block tags without cross-checking
against structure version.
Store the version and primary use case in the DisplayID iterator, and
provide accessors to them. In general, the information is needed when
iterating the blocks, and this is a convenient place to both store and
retrieve the information during parsing.
Promote using accessors rather than users poking at the iterator
directly.
Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin <iam@lach.pw>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad8a35c109f97ffe115e6b18e4a132b592f11089.1676580180.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The VESA Organization Vendor-Specific Data Block, defined in VESA
DisplayID Standard v2.0, specifies the eDP Multi-SST Operation (MSO)
stream count and segment pixel overlap.
DisplayID v1.3 has Appendix B: DisplayID as an EDID Extension,
describing how DisplayID sections may be embedded in EDID extension
blocks. DisplayID v2.0 does not have such a section, perhaps implying
that DisplayID v2.0 data should not be included in EDID extensions, but
rather in a "pure" DisplayID structure at its own DDC address pair
A4h/A5h, as described in VESA E-DDC Standard v1.3 chapter 3.
However, in practice, displays out in the field have embedded DisplayID
v2.0 data blocks in EDID extensions, including, in particular, some eDP
MSO displays, where a pure DisplayID structure is not available at all.
Parse the MSO data from the DisplayID data block. Do it as part of
drm_add_display_info(), extending it to parse also DisplayID data to
avoid requiring extra calls to update the information.
v2: Check for VESA OUI (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/73ca2887e7b37880690f5c9ba4594c9cd1170669.1630419362.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Iterating DisplayID blocks across sections (in EDID extensions) is
unnecessarily complicated for the caller. Implement DisplayID iterators
to go through all blocks in all sections.
Usage example:
const struct displayid_block *block;
struct displayid_iter iter;
displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter);
displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) {
/* operate on block */
}
displayid_iter_end(&iter);
When DisplayID is stored in EDID extensions, the DisplayID sections map
to extensions as described in VESA DisplayID v1.3 Appendix B: DisplayID
as an EDID Extension. This is implemented here.
When DisplayID is stored in its dedicated DDC device 0xA4, according to
VESA E-DDC v1.3, different rules apply for the structure. This is not
implemented here, as we don't currently use it, but the idea is you'd
have a different call for beginning the iteration, for example simply:
displayid_iter_begin(displayid, &iter);
instead of displayid_iter_edid_begin(), and everything else would be
hidden away in the iterator functions.
v2:
- sizeof(struct displayid_block) -> sizeof(*block) (Ville)
- remove __ prefix from displayid_iter_block
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/da3dead1752ab16c061f7bd248ac1a4268f7fefb.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
We'll be adding more DisplayID specific functions going forward, so
start off by splitting out a few functions to a separate file.
We don't bother with exporting the functions; at least for now they
should be needed solely within drm.ko.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/07942d5011891b8e8f77245c78b34f4af97a9315.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
DisplayID blocks allow embedding of CEA blocks. The payloads are
identical to traditional top level CEA extension blocks, but the header
is slightly different.
This change allows the CEA parser to find a CEA block inside a DisplayID
block. Additionally, it adds support for parsing the embedded CTA
header. No further changes are necessary due to payload parity.
This change fixes audio support for the Valve Index HMD.
Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.15
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190619180901.17901-1-andresx7@gmail.com
The tiled 5K Dell monitor appears to be hiding it's tiled mode
inside the displayid timings block, this patch parses this
blocks and adds the modes to the modelist.
v1.1: add missing __packed.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95207
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
