Adds:
- DEFINE_GUARD_COND() / DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND() to extend existing
guards with conditional lock primitives, eg. mutex_trylock(),
mutex_lock_interruptible().
nb. both primitives allow NULL 'locks', which cause the lock to
fail (obviously).
- extends scoped_guard() to not take the body when the the
conditional guard 'fails'. eg.
scoped_guard (mutex_intr, &task->signal_cred_guard_mutex) {
...
}
will only execute the body when the mutex is held.
- provides scoped_cond_guard(name, fail, args...); which extends
scoped_guard() to do fail when the lock-acquire fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231102110706.460851167%40infradead.org
recent discussion brought about the realization that it makes sense for
no_free_ptr() to have __must_check semantics in order to avoid leaking
the resource.
Additionally, add a few comments to clarify why/how things work.
All credit to Linus on how to combine __must_check and the
stmt-expression.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230816103102.GF980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Use __attribute__((__cleanup__(func))) to build:
- simple auto-release pointers using __free()
- 'classes' with constructor and destructor semantics for
scope-based resource management.
- lock guards based on the above classes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230612093537.614161713%40infradead.org
