MIRRORS/linux-yocto
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git synced 2025-12-18 08:36:21 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Enforce expected_attach_type for tailcall compatibility

Browse Source 
[ Upstream commit 4540aed51b ]

Yinhao et al. recently reported:

  Our fuzzer tool discovered an uninitialized pointer issue in the
  bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() function within the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem.
  This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when a BPF program attempts to
  deference the txq member of struct xdp_buff object.

The test initializes two programs of BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP: progA acts as the
entry point for bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() and its expected_attach_type can
neither be of be BPF_XDP_DEVMAP nor BPF_XDP_CPUMAP. progA calls into a slot
of a tailcall map it owns. progB's expected_attach_type must be BPF_XDP_DEVMAP
to pass xdp_is_valid_access() validation. The program returns struct xdp_md's
egress_ifindex, and the latter is only allowed to be accessed under mentioned
expected_attach_type. progB is then inserted into the tailcall which progA
calls.

The underlying issue goes beyond XDP though. Another example are programs
of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR. sock_addr_is_valid_access() as well
as sock_addr_func_proto() have different logic depending on the programs'
expected_attach_type. Similarly, a program attached to BPF_CGROUP_INET4_GETPEERNAME
should not be allowed doing a tailcall into a program which calls bpf_bind()
out of BPF which is only enabled for BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT.

In short, specifying expected_attach_type allows to open up additional
functionality or restrictions beyond what the basic bpf_prog_type enables.
The use of tailcalls must not violate these constraints. Fix it by enforcing
expected_attach_type in __bpf_prog_map_compatible().

Note that we only enforce this for tailcall maps, but not for BPF devmaps or
cpumaps: There, the programs are invoked through dev_map_bpf_prog_run*() and
cpu_map_bpf_prog_run*() which set up a new environment / context and therefore
these situations are not prone to this issue.

Fixes: 5e43f899b0 ("bpf: Check attach type at prog load time")
Reported-by: Yinhao Hu <dddddd@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <M202472210@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250926171201.188490-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Borkmann 2025-09-26 19:12:00 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 44045b107a
commit 08cb3dc9d2
2 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
include/linux/bpf.h
View File

@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ struct bpf_map_owner {
bool xdp_has_frags;
u64 storage_cookie[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE];
const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
};
struct bpf_map {

5
kernel/bpf/core.c
View File

@ -2279,6 +2279,7 @@ static bool __bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
map->owner->type = prog_type;
map->owner->jited = fp->jited;
map->owner->xdp_has_frags = aux->xdp_has_frags;
map->owner->expected_attach_type = fp->expected_attach_type;
map->owner->attach_func_proto = aux->attach_func_proto;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) {
map->owner->storage_cookie[i] =
@ -2290,6 +2291,10 @@ static bool __bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
ret = map->owner->type == prog_type &&
map->owner->jited == fp->jited &&
map->owner->xdp_has_frags == aux->xdp_has_frags;
if (ret &&
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY &&
map->owner->expected_attach_type != fp->expected_attach_type)
ret = false;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) {
if (!ret)
break;