mirror of
git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git
synced 2025-10-22 15:03:53 +02:00
cpufreq/amd-pstate: Refactor max frequency calculation
The previous approach introduced roundoff errors during division when calculating the boost ratio. This, in turn, affected the maximum frequency calculation, often resulting in reporting lower frequency values. For example, on the Glinda SoC based board with the following parameters: max_perf = 208 nominal_perf = 100 nominal_freq = 2600 MHz The Linux kernel previously calculated the frequency as: freq = ((max_perf * 1024 / nominal_perf) * nominal_freq) / 1024 freq = 5405 MHz // Integer arithmetic. With the updated formula: freq = (max_perf * nominal_freq) / nominal_perf freq = 5408 MHz This change ensures more accurate frequency calculations by eliminating unnecessary shifts and divisions, thereby improving precision. Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com> [ML: trim the changelog from commit message] Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241219201833.2750998-1-naresh.solanki@9elements.com Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd604ae6c2
commit
857a61c2ce
|
@ -908,9 +908,8 @@ static int amd_pstate_init_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
|
|||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u32 min_freq, max_freq;
|
||||
u32 nominal_perf, nominal_freq;
|
||||
u32 highest_perf, nominal_perf, nominal_freq;
|
||||
u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf, lowest_nonlinear_freq;
|
||||
u32 boost_ratio, lowest_nonlinear_ratio;
|
||||
struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpudata->cpu, &cppc_perf);
|
||||
|
@ -927,16 +926,12 @@ static int amd_pstate_init_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
|
|||
else
|
||||
nominal_freq = cppc_perf.nominal_freq;
|
||||
|
||||
highest_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
|
||||
nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
|
||||
|
||||
boost_ratio = div_u64(cpudata->highest_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, nominal_perf);
|
||||
max_freq = (nominal_freq * boost_ratio >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT);
|
||||
max_freq = div_u64((u64)highest_perf * nominal_freq, nominal_perf);
|
||||
|
||||
lowest_nonlinear_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf);
|
||||
lowest_nonlinear_ratio = div_u64(lowest_nonlinear_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT,
|
||||
nominal_perf);
|
||||
lowest_nonlinear_freq = (nominal_freq * lowest_nonlinear_ratio >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT);
|
||||
|
||||
lowest_nonlinear_freq = div_u64((u64)nominal_freq * lowest_nonlinear_perf, nominal_perf);
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->min_freq, min_freq * 1000);
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq * 1000);
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq, nominal_freq * 1000);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user