mirror of
git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git
synced 2025-10-22 23:13:01 +02:00
bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage
[ Upstream commitabad3d0bad
] Lonial reported that an out-of-bounds access in cgroup local storage can be crafted via tail calls. Given two programs each utilizing a cgroup local storage with a different value size, and one program doing a tail call into the other. The verifier will validate each of the indivial programs just fine. However, in the runtime context the bpf_cg_run_ctx holds an bpf_prog_array_item which contains the BPF program as well as any cgroup local storage flavor the program uses. Helpers such as bpf_get_local_storage() pick this up from the runtime context: ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_cg_run_ctx, run_ctx); storage = ctx->prog_item->cgroup_storage[stype]; if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED) ptr = &READ_ONCE(storage->buf)->data[0]; else ptr = this_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf); For the second program which was called from the originally attached one, this means bpf_get_local_storage() will pick up the former program's map, not its own. With mismatching sizes, this can result in an unintended out-of-bounds access. To fix this issue, we need to extend bpf_map_owner with an array of storage_cookie[] to match on i) the exact maps from the original program if the second program was using bpf_get_local_storage(), or ii) allow the tail call combination if the second program was not using any of the cgroup local storage maps. Fixes:7d9c342789
("bpf: Make cgroup storages shared between programs on the same cgroup") Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250730234733.530041-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c04992612e
commit
c1c74584b9
|
@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ struct bpf_map_owner {
|
|||
enum bpf_prog_type type;
|
||||
bool jited;
|
||||
bool xdp_has_frags;
|
||||
u64 storage_cookie[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE];
|
||||
const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1837,7 +1837,9 @@ static bool __bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
|
|||
{
|
||||
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = fp->aux->dst_prog ? fp->aux->dst_prog->type : fp->type;
|
||||
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = fp->aux;
|
||||
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type i;
|
||||
bool ret = false;
|
||||
u64 cookie;
|
||||
|
||||
if (fp->kprobe_override)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -1853,12 +1855,25 @@ static bool __bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
|
|||
/* Note: xdp_has_frags doesn't exist in aux yet in our branch */
|
||||
/* map->owner->xdp_has_frags = aux->xdp_has_frags; */
|
||||
map->owner->attach_func_proto = aux->attach_func_proto;
|
||||
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) {
|
||||
map->owner->storage_cookie[i] =
|
||||
aux->cgroup_storage[i] ?
|
||||
aux->cgroup_storage[i]->cookie : 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ret = map->owner->type == prog_type &&
|
||||
map->owner->jited == fp->jited;
|
||||
/* Note: xdp_has_frags check would go here when available */
|
||||
/* && map->owner->xdp_has_frags == aux->xdp_has_frags; */
|
||||
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) {
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
cookie = aux->cgroup_storage[i] ?
|
||||
aux->cgroup_storage[i]->cookie : 0;
|
||||
ret = map->owner->storage_cookie[i] == cookie ||
|
||||
!cookie;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ret &&
|
||||
map->owner->attach_func_proto != aux->attach_func_proto) {
|
||||
switch (prog_type) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user