mirror of
git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git
synced 2025-10-22 15:03:53 +02:00
dma-buf: fix timeout handling in dma_resv_wait_timeout v2
commit 2b95a7db6e
upstream.
Even the kerneldoc says that with a zero timeout the function should not
wait for anything, but still return 1 to indicate that the fences are
signaled now.
Unfortunately that isn't what was implemented, instead of only returning
1 we also waited for at least one jiffies.
Fix that by adjusting the handling to what the function is actually
documented to do.
v2: improve code readability
Reported-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reported-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250129105841.1806-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59205a3e93
commit
d8eab407c0
|
@ -678,11 +678,13 @@ long dma_resv_wait_timeout(struct dma_resv *obj, enum dma_resv_usage usage,
|
|||
dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, obj, usage);
|
||||
dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
|
||||
|
||||
ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, ret);
|
||||
if (ret <= 0) {
|
||||
dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, timeout);
|
||||
if (ret <= 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Even for zero timeout the return value is 1 */
|
||||
if (timeout)
|
||||
timeout = ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user