This may trigger the case fixed by commit 48c3b583bb ("mm/memblock:
fix overlapping allocation when doubling reserved array").
This is done by adding the 129th reserve region into memblock.memory. If
memblock_double_array() use this reserve region as new array, it fails.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507075833.6346-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
The dummy entry is introduced in the initial implementation of lmb in
commit 7c8c6b9776 ("powerpc: Merge lmb.c and make MM initialization
use it.").
As the comment says the empty dummy entry is to simplify the code.
/* Create a dummy zero size LMB which will get coalesced away later.
* This simplifies the lmb_add() code below...
*/
While current code is reimplemented by Tejun in commit 784656f9c6
("memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()"). This empty dummy entry
seems not benefit the code any more.
Let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405015821.13411-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Building memblock tests produces the following warning:
cc -I. -I../../include -Wall -O2 -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=undefined -D CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT -c -o main.o main.c
In file included from tests/common.h:9,
from tests/basic_api.h:5,
from main.c:2:
./linux/memblock.h:601:50: warning: ‘struct seq_file’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
601 | static inline void memtest_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m) { }
| ^~~~~~~~
Add declaration of 'struct seq_file' to tools/include/linux/seq_file.h
to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
This test is aimed at verifying the memblock_alloc_node() to work as
expected, so setting the correct NUMA node for the new allocated
region. The memblock_alloc_node() is called directly without using any
stub. The core check is between the requested NUMA node and the `nid`
field inside the memblock_region structure. These two are supposed to
be equal for the test to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Migliorelli <claudio.migliorelli@mail.polimi.it>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ea5e938e-6b74-b188-af59-4b94b18bc0@mail.polimi.it
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all but one of
these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are run for both top-down
and bottom-up allocation directions.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region cannot be allocated:
+ there are no previously reserved regions, but requested node is
too small
+ the requested node is fully reserved
+ the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
enough space
+ none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested without
dropping min_addr:
+ the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent
reserved regions
- region cannot be allocated:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
second node is the requested node
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
the requested node starts after max_addr
+ nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the
region, but the range is split between two nodes and everything
else is reserved
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51b14da46e6591428df3aefc5acc7dca9341a541.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these
tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a bottom-up
allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
+ there are no previously reserved regions
+ the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
first node is the requested node
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
requested node ends before min_addr
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
the requested node ends before min_addr
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/935f0eed5e06fd44dc67d9f49b277923d7896bd3.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these
tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a top-down
allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
+ there are no previously reserved regions
+ the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
first node is the requested node
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
requested node ends before min_addr
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
the requested node ends before min_addr
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cc0883243d68ddc3faf833d2d9e86f48534c1d7.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add TEST_F_EXACT flag, which specifies that tests should run
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). Introduce range tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() by using the TEST_F_EXACT flag to run the
range tests in alloc_nid_api.c, since memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() and
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() behave the same way when nid = NUMA_NO_NODE.
Rename tests and other functions in alloc_nid_api.c by removing "_try".
Since the test names will be displayed in verbose output, they need to
be general enough to refer to any of the memblock functions that the
tests may run.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a4b6d1b6130ab7375314e1c45a6d5813dfdabbd.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Reserve 129th region in the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region.
At the same time, reserve 128 faked memory region, and make sure these
reserved region not intersect with the valid memory region. So
memblock_double_array() will choose the valid memory region, and it will
success.
Also need to restore the reserved.regions after memblock_double_array(),
to make sure the subsequent tests can run as normal.
Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com
Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a large enough memory
region, and split it into a large enough memory which can be choosed by
memblock_double_array(), and the left memory will be split into small
memory region, and add them into the memblock. It make sure the
memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that
is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init().
So memblock_double_array() must success.
Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after
memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a
memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will
affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So
simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test.
Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
Additionally, two of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are
run for both top-down and bottom-up allocation directions.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region cannot be allocated:
+ none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested without dropping
min_addr:
+ the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent
reserved regions
- region cannot be allocated:
+ nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the region,
but the range is split between two nodes and everything else is
reserved
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4b2c7e6e5f3a9837939e99293c77e0e6fc3ae4f9.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are
run with a bottom-up allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
+ there are no previously reserved regions
+ the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
- the specific node requested cannot accommodate the request, but the
region can be allocated in a different node:
+ there are no previously reserved regions, but node is too small
+ the requested node is fully reserved
+ the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
enough space
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first
node is the requested node
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
requested node ends before min_addr
- region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
allocated in the requested range:
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
requested node ends before min_addr
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
requested node starts after max_addr
- region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
allocated after dropping min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
second node is the requested node
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/00c4810daaf5d050abc71915b24ed7419bb16b51.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are
run with a top-down allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
+ there are no previously reserved regions
+ the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
- the specific node requested cannot accommodate the request, but the
region can be allocated in a different node:
+ there are no previously reserved regions, but node is too small
+ the requested node is fully reserved
+ the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
enough space
Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first
node is the requested node
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
requested node ends before min_addr
- region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
allocated in the requested range:
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
requested node ends before min_addr
+ range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
requested node starts after max_addr
- region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
allocated after dropping min_addr:
+ range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
second node is the requested node
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/84009c5b3969337ccf89df850db56d364f8c228b.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add function setup_numa_memblock() for setting up a memory layout with
multiple NUMA nodes in a previously allocated dummy physical memory.
This function can be used in place of setup_memblock() in tests that need
to simulate a NUMA system.
setup_numa_memblock():
- allows for setting up a memory layout by specifying the fraction of
MEM_SIZE in each node
Set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 4 when building with NUMA=1 to allow for up to
16 NUMA nodes.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4566d816a85f009268d4858d1ef06c7571a960f9.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com
The tests in alloc_nid_api can now run either memblock_alloc_try_nid()
or memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The comment blocks for these tests
should not refer to a 'cleared' region since that only applies to
memblock_alloc_try_nid(). Remove 'cleared' from the comment blocks so
that the comments are accurate for either memblock function.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e8be24137e54e9f81a06af969ded82b319114d7a.1662264347.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_trim_memory() for the following scenarios:
- all regions aligned
- one unaligned region that is smaller than the alignment
- one unaligned region that is unaligned at the base
- one unaligned region that is unaligned at the end
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0e5f55154a3b66581e04ba3717978795cbc08a5b.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Update memblock_alloc_try_nid() tests so that they test either
memblock_alloc_try_nid() or memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() depending on the
value of alloc_nid_test_flags. Run through all the existing tests in
alloc_nid_api twice: once for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and once for
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw().
When the tests run memblock_alloc_try_nid(), they test that the entire
memory region is zero. When the tests run memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(),
they test that the entire memory region is nonzero. The content of the
memory region is initialized to nonzero, and we expect it to remain
unchanged if running memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw().
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6fa8938f67872841c10a00afb042947d1d280a04.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Update memblock_alloc() tests so that they test either memblock_alloc()
or memblock_alloc_raw() depending on the value of alloc_test_flags. Run
through all the existing tests in memblock_alloc_api twice: once for
memblock_alloc() and once for memblock_alloc_raw().
When the tests run memblock_alloc(), they test that the entire memory
region is zero. When the tests run memblock_alloc_raw(), they test that
the entire memory region is nonzero. The content of the memory region is
initialized to nonzero, and we expect it to remain unchanged if running
memblock_alloc_raw().
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a7cfb2f807ee2cb53ee77f9f5c910107b253d6e.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_add(), memblock_reserve(), memblock_remove(),
memblock_free(), and memblock_alloc() for the following test scenarios.
memblock_add() and memblock_reserve():
- add/reserve a memory block in the gap between two existing memory
blocks, and check that the blocks are merged into one region
- try to add/reserve memblock regions that extend past PHYS_ADDR_MAX
memblock_remove() and memblock_free():
- remove/free a region when it is the only available region
+ These tests ensure that the first region is overwritten with a
"dummy" region when the last remaining region of that type is
removed or freed.
- remove/free() a region that overlaps with two existing regions of the
relevant type
- try to remove/free memblock regions that extend past PHYS_ADDR_MAX
memblock_alloc():
- try to allocate a region that is larger than the total size of available
memory (memblock.memory)
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c23c0393c5b9a53fe7f676996913c629495e9727.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Generic tests for memblock_alloc*() functions do not use separate
functions for testing top-down and bottom-up allocation directions.
Therefore, the function name that is displayed in the verbose testing
output does not include the allocation direction.
Add an additional prefix when running generic tests for
memblock_alloc*() functions that indicates which allocation direction is
set. The prefix will be displayed when the tests are run in verbose mode.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fb76a42253d2a196a7daea29dd8121a69904f58e.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Update the assert in memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_from()
tests that checks whether the memory is cleared so that it checks the
entire chunk of allocated memory instead of just the first byte.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/24b3271751756100142e65b75284d43b4d30c9b7.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add an assert in memblock_alloc() tests where allocation is expected to
occur. The assert checks whether the entire chunk of allocated memory is
cleared.
The current memblock_alloc() tests do not check whether the allocated
memory was zeroed. memblock_alloc() should zero the allocated memory since
it is a wrapper for memblock_alloc_try_nid().
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/83ffb941b65074f40eb14552f8bfe5b71fe50abd.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com
The VERBOSE build option was replaced with the --verbose runtime option,
but the comments describing the ASSERT_*() macros still refer to the
VERBOSE build option. Update these comments so that they refer to the
--verbose runtime option.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5f8a4c2bde34cc029282c68d47eda982d950f421.1660451025.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add a help command line option to the help message. Add the help option
to the short and long options so it will be recognized as a valid
option.
Usage:
$ ./main -h
Or:
$ ./main --help
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0f3b93a79de78c0da1ca90f74fe35e9a85c7cf93.1660451025.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Add and use functions and macros for printing verbose testing output.
If the Memblock simulator was compiled with VERBOSE=1:
- prefix_push(): appends the given string to a prefix string that will be
printed in test_fail() and test_pass*().
- prefix_pop(): removes the last prefix from the prefix string.
- prefix_reset(): clears the prefix string.
- test_fail(): prints a message after a test fails containing the test
number of the failing test and the prefix.
- test_pass(): prints a message after a test passes containing its test
number and the prefix.
- test_print(): prints the given formatted output string.
- test_pass_pop(): runs test_pass() followed by prefix_pop().
- PREFIX_PUSH(): runs prefix_push(__func__).
If the Memblock simulator was not compiled with VERBOSE=1, these
functions/macros do nothing.
Add the assert wrapper macros ASSERT_EQ(), ASSERT_NE(), and ASSERT_LT().
If the assert condition fails, these macros call test_fail() before
executing assert().
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f234d443fe154d5ae8d8aa07284aff69edfb6f61.1656907314.git.remckee0@gmail.com
Update comments in memblock_free_*() functions to match the style used
in tests/alloc_*.c by rewording to make the expected outcome more apparent
and, if more than one memblock is involved, adding a visual of the
memory blocks.
If the comment has an extra column of spaces, remove the extra space at
the beginning of each line for consistency and to conform to Linux kernel
coding style.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Update comments in memblock_remove_*() functions to match the style used
in tests/alloc_*.c by rewording to make the expected outcome more apparent
and, if more than one memblock is involved, adding a visual of the
memory blocks.
If the comment has an extra column of spaces, remove the extra space at
the beginning of each line for consistency and to conform to Linux kernel
coding style.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Update comments in memblock_reserve_*() functions to match the style used
in tests/alloc_*.c by rewording to make the expected outcome more apparent
and, if more than one memblock is involved, adding a visual of the
memory blocks.
If the comment has an extra column of spaces, remove the extra space at
the beginning of each line for consistency and to conform to Linux kernel
coding style.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Update comments in memblock_add_*() functions to match the style used
in tests/alloc_*.c by rewording to make the expected outcome more apparent
and, if more than one memblock is involved, adding a visual of the
memory blocks.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Add checks for memblock_alloc_try_nid for bottom up allocation direction.
As the definition of this function is pretty close to the core
memblock_alloc_range_nid, the test cases implemented here cover most of
the code paths related to the memory allocations.
The tested scenarios are:
- Region can be allocated within the requested range (both with aligned
and misaligned boundaries)
- Region can be allocated between two already existing entries
- Not enough space between already reserved regions
- Memory at the range boundaries is reserved but there is enough space
to allocate a new region
- The memory range is too narrow but memory can be allocated before
the maximum address
- Edge cases:
+ Minimum address is below memblock_start_of_DRAM()
+ Maximum address is above memblock_end_of_DRAM()
Add test case wrappers to test both directions in the same context.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1c0ba11b8da5dc8f71ad45175c536fa4be720984.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid for top down allocation direction.
As the definition of this function is pretty close to the core
memblock_alloc_range_nid, the test cases implemented here cover most of
the code paths related to the memory allocations.
The tested scenarios are:
- Region can be allocated within the requested range (both with aligned
and misaligned boundaries)
- Region can be allocated between two already existing entries
- Not enough space between already reserved regions
- Memory range is too narrow but memory can be allocated before
the maximum address
- Edge cases:
+ Minimum address is below memblock_start_of_DRAM()
+ Maximum address is above memblock_end_of_DRAM()
Add checks for both allocation directions:
- Region starts at the min_addr and ends at max_addr
- Maximum address is too close to the beginning of the available
memory
- Memory at the range boundaries is reserved but there is enough space
to allocate a new region
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d6c282e0f9f62c15bf74c216214604764232d637.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for memblock_alloc_from for bottom up allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
- Not enough space to allocate memory at the minimal address
- Minimal address parameter is smaller than the start address
of the available memory
- Minimal address parameter is too close to the end of the available
memory
Add test case wrappers to test both directions in the same context.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/506cf5293c8a21c012b7ea87b14af07754d3e656.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for memblock_alloc_from for default allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
- Not enough space to allocate memory at the minimal address
- Minimal address parameter is smaller than the start address
of the available memory
- Minimal address is too close to the available memory
Add simple memblock_alloc_from test that can be used to test both
allocation directions (minimal address is aligned or misaligned).
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3dd645f437975fd393010b95b8faa85d2b86490a.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for memblock_alloc for bottom up allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
- Region can be allocated on the first fit (with and without
region merging)
- Region can be allocated on the second fit (with and without
region merging)
Add test case wrappers to test both directions in the same context.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/426674eee20d99dca49caf1ee0142a83dccbc98d.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for memblock_alloc for top down allocation direction.
The tested scenarios are:
- Region can be allocated on the first fit (with and without
region merging)
- Region can be allocated on the second fit (with and without
region merging)
Add checks for both allocation directions:
- Region can be allocated between two already existing entries
- Limited memory available
- All memory is reserved
- No available memory registered with memblock
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/26ccf409b8ff0394559d38d792b2afb24b55887c.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Allocation functions that return virtual addresses (with an exception
of _raw variant) clear the allocated memory after reserving it. This
requires valid memory ranges in memblock.memory.
Introduce memory_block variable to store memory that can be registered
with memblock data structure. Move assert.h and size.h includes to common.h
to share them between the test files.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dce115503c74a6936c44694b00014658a1bb6522.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
All memblock data structure fields are reset in one function. In some
test cases, it's preferred to reset memory region arrays without
modifying other values like allocation direction flag.
Extract two functions from reset_memblock, so it's possible to reset
different parts of memblock:
- reset_memblock_regions - reset region arrays and their counters
- reset_memblock_attributes - set other fields to their default values
Update checks in basic_api.c to use new definitions. Remove
reset_memblock call from memblock_initialization_check, so the true
initial values are tested.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5cc1ba9a0ade922dbf4ba450165b81a9ed17d4a9.1646055639.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for removing a region from reserved memory in different
scenarios:
- The requested region matches one in the collection of reserved
memory regions
- The requested region does not exist in memblock.reserved
- The region overlaps with one of the entries: from the top (its
end address is bigger than the base of the existing region) or
from the bottom (its base address is smaller than the end address
of one of the regions)
- The region is within an already defined region
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30af95c82754ad8029404c3b528a5ef1c05d1ed6.1643796665.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for removing a region from available memory in different
scenarios:
- The requested region matches one in the collection of available
memory regions
- The requested region does not exist in memblock.memory
- The region overlaps with one of the entries: from the top (its end
address is bigger than the base of the existing region) or from the
bottom (its base address is smaller than the end address of one of
the regions)
- The region is within an already defined region
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8e6aa005407bbe1a75b75e85ac04ebb51318a52a.1643796665.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for marking a region as reserved in different scenarios:
- The region does not overlap with existing entries
- The region overlaps with one of the previous entries: from the top
(its end address is bigger than the base of the existing region) or
from the bottom (its base address is smaller than the end address of
one of the regions)
- The region is within an already defined region
- The same region is marked as reserved twice
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cac867d2b6c17e53d9e977b5d6cd88cc4e9453b6.1643796665.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Add checks for adding a new region in different scenarios:
- The region does not overlap with existing entries
- The region overlaps with one of the previous entries: from the top
(its end address is bigger than the base of the existing region) or
from the bottom (its base address is smaller than the end address of
one of the regions)
- The region is within an already defined region
- The same region is added twice to the collection of available memory
regions
Add checks for memblock initialization to verify it sets memblock data
structures to expected values.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b6c26525025bccec0bf7419473d4d1293eb82b3b.1643796665.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
Memblock simulator needs to be able to reset memblock data structures
between different test cases. Add a function that sets all fields to
their default values.
Add a test checking if memblock is being initialized to expected values.
Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c185aa7e0dd68c2c7e937c9a06c90ae413e240f.1643796665.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com
