The isomorphism neg_if_exp negates the test of a ?: conditional,
making it unnecessary to have an explicit case for a negated test
with the branches inverted.
At the same time, we can disable neg_if_exp in cases where a
different API function may be more suitable for a negated test.
Finally, in the non-patch cases, E matches an expression with
parentheses around it, so there is no need to mention ()
explicitly in the pattern. The () are still needed in the patch
cases, because we want to drop them, if they are present.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
The parentheses are only needed if there is a disjunction, ie a
set of possible changes. If there is only one pattern, we can
remove these parentheses. Just like the format:
- x
+ y
not:
(
- x
+ y
)
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_yes_no()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_on_off()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_write_read()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_read_write()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_enable{d}_
disable{d}() to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_lo{w}_hi{gh}()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_hi{gh}_lo{w}()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As done with str_true_false(), add checks for str_false_true()
opportunities. A simple test can find over 9 cases currently
exist in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree,
we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false()
can be used. A simple test can find over 10 locations.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As done with str_up_down(), add checks for str_down_up() opportunities.
5 cases currently exist in the tree.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812183637.work.999-kees@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Add rules for finding places where str_plural() can be used. This
currently finds:
54 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Co-developed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fc1b25a8-6381-47c2-831c-ab6b8201a82b@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
