[ Upstream commit b0522303f6 ]
In exfat_find_last_cluster(), the cluster chain is traversed until
the EOF cluster. If the cluster chain includes a loop due to file
system corruption, the EOF cluster cannot be traversed, resulting
in an infinite loop.
If the number of clusters indicated by the file size is inconsistent
with the cluster chain length, exfat_find_last_cluster() will return
an error, so if this inconsistency is found, the traversal can be
aborted without traversing to the EOF cluster.
Reported-by: syzbot+f7d147e6db52b1e09dba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f7d147e6db52b1e09dba
Tested-by: syzbot+f7d147e6db52b1e09dba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 31023864e6 ("exfat: add fat entry operations")
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fee873761b ]
If the file system is corrupted so that a cluster is linked to
itself in the cluster chain, and there is an unused directory
entry in the cluster, 'dentry' will not be incremented, causing
condition 'dentry < max_dentries' unable to prevent an infinite
loop.
This infinite loop causes s_lock not to be released, and other
tasks will hang, such as exfat_sync_fs().
This commit stops traversing the cluster chain when there is unused
directory entry in the cluster to avoid this infinite loop.
Reported-by: syzbot+205c2644abdff9d3f9fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=205c2644abdff9d3f9fc
Tested-by: syzbot+205c2644abdff9d3f9fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 89fc548767 upstream.
When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi->s_lock between the two processes may occur.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
kswapd
balance_pgdat
lock(fs_reclaim)
exfat_iterate
lock(&sbi->s_lock)
exfat_readdir
exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
exfat_get_dentry_set
__exfat_get_dentry_set
kmalloc_array
...
lock(fs_reclaim)
...
evict
exfat_evict_inode
lock(&sbi->s_lock)
To fix this, let's allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.
Fixes: a3ff29a95f ("exfat: support dynamic allocate bh for exfat_entry_set_cache")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.2+
Reported-by: syzbot+412a392a2cd4a65e71db@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000fef47e0618c0327f@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
[Sherry: The problematic commit was backported to 5.15.y and 5.10.y, thus backport this fix]
Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 02dffe9ab0 upstream.
There is no check if stream size and start_clu are invalid.
If start_clu is EOF cluster and stream size is 4096, It will
cause uninit value access. because ei->hint_femp.eidx could
be 128(if cluster size is 4K) and wrong hint will allocate
next cluster. and this cluster will be same with the cluster
that is allocated by exfat_extend_valid_size(). The previous
patch will check invalid start_clu, but for clarity, initialize
hint_femp.eidx to zero.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+01218003be74b5e1213a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+01218003be74b5e1213a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d2b537b3e5 upstream.
If the first directory entry in the root directory is not a bitmap
directory entry, 'bh' will not be released and reassigned, which
will cause a memory leak.
Fixes: 1e49a94cf7 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit dab48b8f2f ]
After repairing a corrupted file system with exfatprogs' fsck.exfat,
zero-size directories may result. It is also possible to create
zero-size directories in other exFAT implementation, such as Paragon
ufsd dirver.
As described in the specification, the lower directory size limits
is 0 bytes.
Without this commit, sub-directories and files cannot be created
under a zero-size directory, and it cannot be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d42334578e ]
exfat_extract_uni_name copies characters from a given file name entry into
the 'uniname' variable. This variable is actually defined on the stack of
the exfat_readdir() function. According to the definition of
the 'exfat_uni_name' type, the file name should be limited 255 characters
(+ null teminator space), but the exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry()
function can write more characters because there is no check if filename
entries exceeds max filename length. This patch add the check not to copy
filename characters when exceeding max filename length.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reported-by: Maxim Suhanov <dfirblog@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a3ff29a95f ]
In special cases, a file or a directory may occupied more than 19
directory entries, pre-allocating 3 bh is not enough. Such as
- Support vendor secondary directory entry in the future.
- Since file directory entry is damaged, the SecondaryCount
field is bigger than 18.
So this commit supports dynamic allocation of bh.
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: d42334578e ("exfat: check if filename entries exceeds max filename length")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c6e2f52e30 ]
When directory iterate and lookup is called, there's a buggy rewinding
of start point for traversing cluster chain to the parent directory
entry's first cluster. This caused repeated cluster chain traversing
from the first entry of the parent directory that would show worse
performance if huge amounts of files exist under the parent directory.
Fix not to rewind, make continue from currently referenced cluster and
dir entry.
Tested with 50,000 files under single directory / 256GB sdcard,
with command "time ls -l > /dev/null",
Before : 0m08.69s real 0m00.27s user 0m05.91s system
After : 0m07.01s real 0m00.25s user 0m04.34s system
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Stable-dep-of: d42334578e ("exfat: check if filename entries exceeds max filename length")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit daf60d6cca upstream.
The call stack shown below is a scenario in the Linux 4.19 kernel.
Allocating memory failed where exfat fs use kmalloc_array due to
system memory fragmentation, while the u-disk was inserted without
recognition.
Devices such as u-disk using the exfat file system are pluggable and
may be insert into the system at any time.
However, long-term running systems cannot guarantee the continuity of
physical memory. Therefore, it's necessary to address this issue.
Binder:2632_6: page allocation failure: order:4,
mode:0x6040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null)
Call trace:
[242178.097582] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4
[242178.097589] dump_stack+0xf4/0x134
[242178.097598] warn_alloc+0xd8/0x144
[242178.097603] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1364/0x1384
[242178.097608] kmalloc_order+0x2c/0x510
[242178.097612] kmalloc_order_trace+0x40/0x16c
[242178.097618] __kmalloc+0x360/0x408
[242178.097624] load_alloc_bitmap+0x160/0x284
[242178.097628] exfat_fill_super+0xa3c/0xe7c
[242178.097635] mount_bdev+0x2e8/0x3a0
[242178.097638] exfat_fs_mount+0x40/0x50
[242178.097643] mount_fs+0x138/0x2e8
[242178.097649] vfs_kern_mount+0x90/0x270
[242178.097655] do_mount+0x798/0x173c
[242178.097659] ksys_mount+0x114/0x1ac
[242178.097665] __arm64_sys_mount+0x24/0x34
[242178.097671] el0_svc_common+0xb8/0x1b8
[242178.097676] el0_svc_handler+0x74/0x90
[242178.097681] el0_svc+0x8/0x340
By analyzing the exfat code,we found that continuous physical memory
is not required here,so kvmalloc_array is used can solve this problem.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: gaoming <gaoming20@hihonor.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 39c1ce8eaf upstream.
inode->i_blocks is not real number of blocks, but 512 byte ones.
Fixes: 98d917047e ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Tested-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit bdaadfd343 upstream.
When a file or a directory is deleted, the hint for the cluster of
its parent directory in its in-memory inode is set as DIR_DELETED.
Therefore, DIR_DELETED must be one of invalid cluster numbers. According
to the exFAT specification, a volume can have at most 2^32-11 clusters.
However, DIR_DELETED is wrongly defined as 0xFFFF0321, which could be
a valid cluster number. To fix it, let's redefine DIR_DELETED as
0xFFFFFFF7, the bad cluster number.
Fixes: 1acf1a564b ("exfat: add in-memory and on-disk structures and headers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6cb5d1a16a upstream.
If the position is not aligned with the dentry size, the return
value of readdir() will be NULL and errno is 0, which means the
end of the directory stream is reached.
If the position is aligned with dentry size, but there is no file
or directory at the position, exfat_readdir() will continue to
get dentry from the next dentry. So the dentry gotten by readdir()
may not be at the position.
After this commit, if the position is not aligned with the dentry
size, round the position up to the dentry size and continue to get
the dentry.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 706fdcac00 upstream.
Since seekdir() does not check whether the position is valid, the
position may exceed the size of the directory. We found that for
a directory with discontinuous clusters, if the position exceeds
the size of the directory and the excess size is greater than or
equal to the cluster size, exfat_readdir() will return -EIO,
causing a file system error and making the file system unavailable.
Reproduce this bug by:
seekdir(dir, dir_size + cluster_size);
dirent = readdir(dir);
The following log will be printed if mount with 'errors=remount-ro'.
[11166.712896] exFAT-fs (sdb1): error, invalid access to FAT (entry 0xffffffff)
[11166.712905] exFAT-fs (sdb1): Filesystem has been set read-only
Fixes: 1e5654de0f ("exfat: handle wrong stream entry size in exfat_readdir()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 64ba4b15e5 upstream.
Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds read in exfat_clear_bitmap.
This was triggered by reproducer calling truncute with size 0,
which causes the following trace:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888115aa9508 by task syz-executor251/365
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e2/0x24b lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_address_description+0x81/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:233
__kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline]
kasan_report+0x1a4/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:436
__asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report_generic.c:309
exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
exfat_free_cluster+0x25a/0x4a0 fs/exfat/fatent.c:181
__exfat_truncate+0x99e/0xe00 fs/exfat/file.c:217
exfat_truncate+0x11b/0x4f0 fs/exfat/file.c:243
exfat_setattr+0xa03/0xd40 fs/exfat/file.c:339
notify_change+0xb76/0xe10 fs/attr.c:336
do_truncate+0x1ea/0x2d0 fs/open.c:65
Move the is_valid_cluster() helper from fatent.c to a common
header to make it reusable in other *.c files. And add is_valid_cluster()
to validate if cluster number is within valid range in exfat_clear_bitmap()
and exfat_set_bitmap().
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=50381fc73821ecae743b8cf24b4c9a04776f767c
Reported-by: syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1e49a94cf7 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 839a534f1e upstream.
In d_make_root, when we fail to allocate dentry for root inode,
we will iput root inode and returned value is NULL in this function.
So we do not need to release this inode again at d_make_root's caller.
Signed-off-by: Chen Li <chenli@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 92fba084b7 ]
In exfat_truncate(), the computation of inode->i_blocks is wrong if
the file is larger than 4 GiB because a 32-bit variable is used as a
mask. This is fixed and simplified by using round_up().
Also fix the same buggy computation in exfat_read_root() and another
(correct) one in exfat_fill_inode(). The latter was fixed another way
last month but can be simplified by using round_up() as well. See:
commit 0c336d6e33 ("exfat: fix incorrect loading of i_blocks for
large files")
Fixes: 98d917047e ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Vu-Brugier <christophe.vu-brugier@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 0c336d6e33 upstream.
When calculating i_blocks, there was a mistake that was masked with a
32-bit variable. So i_blocks for files larger than 4 GiB had incorrect
values. Mask with a 64-bit variable instead of 32-bit one.
Fixes: 5f2aa07507 ("exfat: add inode operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Ganapathi Kamath <hgkamath@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1e5654de0f upstream.
The compatibility issue between linux exfat and exfat of some camera
company was reported from Florian. In their exfat, if the number of files
exceeds any limit, the DataLength in stream entry of the directory is
no longer updated. So some files created from camera does not show in
linux exfat. because linux exfat doesn't allow that cpos becomes larger
than DataLength of stream entry. This patch check DataLength in stream
entry only if the type is ALLOC_NO_FAT_CHAIN and add the check ensure
that dentry offset does not exceed max dentries size(256 MB) to avoid
the circular FAT chain issue.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9
Reported-by: Florian Cramer <flrncrmr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77edfc6e51 upstream.
If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear
cluster bit to remove file. But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector
calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size which is 2,
leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster.
With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap
functions.
Fixes: 1e49a94cf7 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 78c276f549 upstream.
syzbot reported a warning which could cause shift-out-of-bounds issue.
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
dump_stack+0x183/0x22e lib/dump_stack.c:120
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:148 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x432/0x4d0 lib/ubsan.c:395
exfat_read_boot_sector fs/exfat/super.c:471 [inline]
__exfat_fill_super fs/exfat/super.c:556 [inline]
exfat_fill_super+0x2acb/0x2d00 fs/exfat/super.c:624
get_tree_bdev+0x406/0x630 fs/super.c:1291
vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1496
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2881 [inline]
path_mount+0x1937/0x2c50 fs/namespace.c:3211
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3224 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3432 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3409
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
exfat specification describe sect_per_clus_bits field of boot sector
could be at most 25 - sect_size_bits and at least 0. And sect_size_bits
can also affect this calculation, It also needs validation.
This patch add validation for sect_per_clus_bits and sect_size_bits
field of boot sector.
Fixes: 719c1e1829 ("exfat: add super block operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
Reported-by: syzbot+da4fe66aaadd3c2e2d1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Pull misc vfs updates from Al Viro:
"Assorted stuff all over the place (the largest group here is
Christoph's stat cleanups)"
* 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
fs: remove KSTAT_QUERY_FLAGS
fs: remove vfs_stat_set_lookup_flags
fs: move vfs_fstatat out of line
fs: implement vfs_stat and vfs_lstat in terms of vfs_fstatat
fs: remove vfs_statx_fd
fs: omfs: use kmemdup() rather than kmalloc+memcpy
[PATCH] reduce boilerplate in fsid handling
fs: Remove duplicated flag O_NDELAY occurring twice in VALID_OPEN_FLAGS
selftests: mount: add nosymfollow tests
Add a "nosymfollow" mount option.
In exfat_move_file(), the identity of source and target directory has been
checked by the caller.
Also, it gets stream.start_clu from file dir-entry, which is an invalid
determination.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the parameter of
exfat_readdir().
Since rwoffset is referenced only by exfat_readdir(), it is not necessary
a exfat_inode_info's member.
Also, change cpos to point to the next of entry-set, and return the index
of dir-entry via dir_entry->entry.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
There is nothing in directory just created, so there is no need to scan.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
The exfat_find_dir_entry() called by exfat_find() doesn't return -EEXIST.
Therefore, the root-dir information setting is never executed.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We alreday has the interface i_blocksize() to get blocksize,
so use it.
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Fix missing result check of exfat_build_inode().
And use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead of PTR_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
MediaFailure and VolumeDirty should be retained if these are set before
mounting.
In '3.1.13.3 Media Failure Field' of exfat specification describe:
If, upon mounting a volume, the value of this field is 1,
implementations which scan the entire volume for media failures and
record all failures as "bad" clusters in the FAT (or otherwise resolve
media failures) may clear the value of this field to 0.
Therefore, We should not clear MediaFailure without scanning volume.
In '8.1 Recommended Write Ordering' of exfat specification describe:
Clear the value of the VolumeDirty field to 0, if its value prior to
the first step was 0.
Therefore, We should not clear VolumeDirty after mounting.
Also rename ERR_MEDIUM to MEDIA_FAILURE.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Replace part of exfat_zeroed_cluster() with exfat_update_bhs().
And remove exfat_sync_bhs().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Write multiple sectors at once when updating dir-entries.
Add exfat_update_bhs() for that. It wait for write completion once
instead of sector by sector.
It's only effective if sync enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
This flag is set/reset in exfat_put_super()/exfat_sync_fs()
to avoid sync_blockdev().
- exfat_put_super():
Before calling this, the VFS has already called sync_filesystem(),
so sync is never performed here.
- exfat_sync_fs():
After calling this, the VFS calls sync_blockdev(), so, it is meaningless
to check EXFAT_SB_DIRTY or to bypass sync_blockdev() here.
Remove the EXFAT_SB_DIRTY check to ensure synchronization.
And remove the code related to the flag.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
On-disk format for name_hash field is LE, so it must be explicitly
transformed on BE system for proper result.
Fixes: 370e812b3e ("exfat: add nls operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Ponetayev <i.ponetaev@ndmsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
The stream.size field is updated to the value of create timestamp
of the file entry. Fix this to use correct stream entry pointer.
Fixes: 29bbb14bfc ("exfat: fix incorrect update of stream entry in __exfat_truncate()")
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We found the wrong hint_stat initialization in exfat_find_dir_entry().
It should be initialized when cluster is EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
An overflow issue can occur while calculating sector in
exfat_cluster_to_sector(). It needs to cast clus's type to sector_t
before left shifting.
Fixes: 1acf1a564b ("exfat: add in-memory and on-disk structures and headers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
generic_file_fsync() exfat used could not guarantee the consistency of
a file because it has flushed not dirty metadata but only dirty data pages
for a file.
Instead of that, use exfat_file_fsync() for files and directories so that
it guarantees to commit both the metadata and data pages for a file.
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We need to commit dirty metadata and pages to disk
before remounting exfat as read-only.
This fixes a failure in xfstests generic/452
generic/452 does the following:
cp something <exfat>/
mount -o remount,ro <exfat>
the <exfat>/something is corrupted. because while
exfat is remounted as read-only, exfat doesn't
have a chance to commit metadata and
vfs invalidates page caches in a block device.
Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
If the second exfat_get_dentry() call fails then we need to release
"old_bh" before returning. There is a similar bug in exfat_move_file().
Fixes: 5f2aa07507 ("exfat: add inode operations")
Reported-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Some fsck tool complain that padding part of the FileName field
is not set to the value 0000h. So let's maintain filesystem cleaner,
as exfat's spec. recommendation.
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok.Kim <Hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
