[ Upstream commit 661f951e37 ]
Leon [1] and Vinicius [2] noted a topology_span_sane() warning during
their testing starting from v6.16-rc1. Debug that followed pointed to
the tl->mask() for the NODE domain being incorrectly resolved to that of
the highest NUMA domain.
tl->mask() for NODE is set to the sd_numa_mask() which depends on the
global "sched_domains_curr_level" hack. "sched_domains_curr_level" is
set to the "tl->numa_level" during tl traversal in build_sched_domains()
calling sd_init() but was not reset before topology_span_sane().
Since "tl->numa_level" still reflected the old value from
build_sched_domains(), topology_span_sane() for the NODE domain trips
when the span of the last NUMA domain overlaps.
Instead of replicating the "sched_domains_curr_level" hack, get rid of
it entirely and instead, pass the entire "sched_domain_topology_level"
object to tl->cpumask() function to prevent such mishap in the future.
sd_numa_mask() now directly references "tl->numa_level" instead of
relying on the global "sched_domains_curr_level" hack to index into
sched_domains_numa_masks[].
The original warning was reproducible on the following NUMA topology
reported by Leon:
$ sudo numactl -H
available: 5 nodes (0-4)
node 0 cpus: 0 1
node 0 size: 2927 MB
node 0 free: 1603 MB
node 1 cpus: 2 3
node 1 size: 3023 MB
node 1 free: 3008 MB
node 2 cpus: 4 5
node 2 size: 3023 MB
node 2 free: 3007 MB
node 3 cpus: 6 7
node 3 size: 3023 MB
node 3 free: 3002 MB
node 4 cpus: 8 9
node 4 size: 3022 MB
node 4 free: 2718 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3 4
0: 10 39 38 37 36
1: 39 10 38 37 36
2: 38 38 10 37 36
3: 37 37 37 10 36
4: 36 36 36 36 10
The above topology can be mimicked using the following QEMU cmd that was
used to reproduce the warning and test the fix:
sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host \
-m 20G -smp cpus=10,sockets=10 -machine q35 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m2 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m3 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m4 \
-numa node,cpus=0-1,memdev=m0,nodeid=0 \
-numa node,cpus=2-3,memdev=m1,nodeid=1 \
-numa node,cpus=4-5,memdev=m2,nodeid=2 \
-numa node,cpus=6-7,memdev=m3,nodeid=3 \
-numa node,cpus=8-9,memdev=m4,nodeid=4 \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=39 \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=2,val=38 \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=3,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=4,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=0,val=39 \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=2,val=38 \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=3,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=4,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=0,val=38 \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=1,val=38 \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=3,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=4,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=0,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=1,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=2,val=37 \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=4,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=0,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=1,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=2,val=36 \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=3,val=36 \
...
[ prateek: Moved common functions to include/linux/sched/topology.h,
reuse the common bits for s390 and ppc, commit message ]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250610110701.GA256154@unreal/ [1]
Fixes: ccf74128d6 ("sched/topology: Assert non-NUMA topology masks don't (partially) overlap") # ce29a7da84, f55dac1daf
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> # x86
Tested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> # powerpc
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a3de98387abad28592e6ab591f3ff6107fe01dc1.1755893468.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/ [2]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
788bfdb558