mirror of
git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-freescale.git
synced 2025-07-19 21:09:04 +02:00
d93b387a87
The imx8dx-mek machine is similar to imx8qxp-mek and so the mx8qxp override was included in the MACHINEOVERRIDES hierarchy. This is non-standard, and the rework of the SOC overrides didn't handle it properly, leading to a build break: ``` Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile | NOTE: 8QX boot binary build | cp: failed to access '/home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/git/iMX8DX/scfw_tcm.bin': Not a directory | WARNING: /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.1809636:179 exit 1 from 'cp /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/deploy/images/imx8dx-mek/imx-boot$ tools/scfw_tcm.bin /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/git/iMX8DX/scfw_tcm.bin' | WARNING: Backtrace (BB generated script): | #1: compile_mx8x, /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.1809636, line 179 | #2: do_compile, /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.1809636, line 151 | #3: main, /home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/build/tmp/work/imx8dx_mek-oel-linux/imx-boot/1.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.1809636, line 189 ERROR: Task (/home/aquino/src/ossystems/oel-platform/sources/meta-freescale/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_1.0.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' ``` Fix the problem by removing mx8qxp from the mx8dx hierarchy and adapting existing mx8qxp overrides appropriately. Fixes: #1027 Signed-off-by: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@nxp.com>
37 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
37 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
#
|
|
# Class to provide a possibility to re-use names of Security Controller (SECO)
|
|
# Firmware files, which are required by certain derivatives on i.MX8 family.
|
|
#
|
|
# SECO Firmware names are used by imx-boot and imx-seco recipes, therefore
|
|
# their respective definitions are moved into a separate class, which is
|
|
# inherited by both recipes.
|
|
#
|
|
# Currently, only 'mx8m' family does not require SECO FW to be provided in the
|
|
# target image, therefore as a first step - the machine override is verified
|
|
# if it matches, and then derivative is taken.
|
|
#
|
|
# NOTE: SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME defaults to empty string, and is verified against
|
|
# the family first. If a derivative in the family does not have a firmware name
|
|
# set in this class - recipe parsing is stopped.
|
|
# This behavior ensures that derivatives which requires SECO Firmware to be
|
|
# present in the image file have it properly defined.
|
|
|
|
SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME ?= ""
|
|
SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME:mx8qm-nxp-bsp = "mx8qmb0-ahab-container.img"
|
|
SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME:mx8qxp-nxp-bsp = \
|
|
"${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES', 'soc-revb0', 'mx8qxb0-ahab-container.img', \
|
|
'mx8qxc0-ahab-container.img', d)}"
|
|
SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME:mx8dx-nxp-bsp = "mx8qxc0-ahab-container.img"
|
|
SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME:mx8dxl-nxp-bsp = "mx8dxla1-ahab-container.img"
|
|
|
|
python () {
|
|
if "mx8m-nxp-bsp" in d.getVar('MACHINEOVERRIDES').split(":"):
|
|
return # We need to allow the recipes to be parsed for this case
|
|
|
|
seco_firmware = d.getVar('SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME')
|
|
if not seco_firmware:
|
|
raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("This SoC requires 'SECO_FIRMWARE_NAME', define it in 'use-imx-security-controller-firmware' bbclass")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_SOCARCH}"
|