Add a basic test for bb.utils.md5_file() etc.
(Bitbake rev: e944d02fe678f7c6b05c62419f8bceb0709f3037)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* this is just another test case for issue already fixed in:
commit fef56d28c3efec4876c379898cbc4d4c65303aee
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Feb 24 21:07:28 2019 +0100
Subject: bitbake: fix version comparison when one of the versions ends in .
* The TypeError is triggered not by '.' at the end, but from the extra
numberic component in one of the versions.
* When one version has fewer elements, it's extended by another (0, None)
element where 0 means numeric component. Then the result cannot be
decided by comparing the types (oa < ob, ob > oa) and it continues
to compare values (ca < cb) which fails when one of them is the None
from (0, None) appended before.
======================================================================
ERROR: test_vercmpstring (bb.tests.utils.VerCmpString)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "lib/bb/tests/utils.py", line 32, in test_vercmpstring
result = bb.utils.vercmp_string('1a', '1a1')
File "lib/bb/utils.py", line 131, in vercmp_string
return vercmp(ta, tb)
File "lib/bb/utils.py", line 123, in vercmp
r = vercmp_part(va, vb)
File "lib/bb/utils.py", line 112, in vercmp_part
elif ca < cb:
TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'NoneType' and 'int'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 3 tests in 0.002s
(Bitbake rev: 9767fffe3115a1f1afa3c6a2b39720fefb8dc4d5)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There are much better ways to handle this and most editors shouldn't need this
in modern times, drop the noise from the files. Its not consitently applied
anyway.
(Bitbake rev: 5e43070e3087d09aea2f459b033d035c5ef747d0)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With the introduction of SPDX-License-Identifier headers, we don't need a ton
of header boilerplate in every file. Simplify the files and rely on the top
level for the full licence text.
(Bitbake rev: 695d84397b68cc003186e22f395caa378b06bc75)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds the SPDX-License-Identifier license headers to the majority of
our source files to make it clearer exactly which license files are under.
The bulk of the files are under GPL v2.0 with one found to be under V2.0
or later, some under MIT and some have dual license. There are some files
which are potentially harder to classify where we've imported upstream code
and those can be handled specifically in later commits.
The COPYING file is replaced with LICENSE.X files which contain the full
license texts.
(Bitbake rev: ff237c33337f4da2ca06c3a2c49699bc26608a6b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Previously, this would happen:
======================================================================
ERROR: test_vercmpstring (bb.tests.utils.VerCmpString)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/alexander/development/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/utils.py", line 45, in test_vercmpstring
result = bb.utils.vercmp_string('1.', '1.1')
File "/home/alexander/development/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py", line 143, in vercmp_string
return vercmp(ta, tb)
File "/home/alexander/development/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py", line 135, in vercmp
r = vercmp_part(va, vb)
File "/home/alexander/development/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py", line 124, in vercmp_part
elif ca < cb:
TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'NoneType' and 'int'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Bitbake rev: fef56d28c3efec4876c379898cbc4d4c65303aee)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There were no tests that verified the value of origvalue in the callback
routines used by edit_metadata(). This patch adds one for a simple
multiline variable.
(Bitbake rev: ece3a4d02d8162dee78c2062c10291b5fd625c36)
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
edit_metadata() would corrupt a variable that was multiline, but
had the ending quotes on the same line as the last value. For example:
TEST_VAR = " foo \
bar"
would become " foo ba" because the code would always delete the last
character on the line and then do it again if the line ended in the
quote. This however doesn't show up if you have:
TEST_VAR = " foo \
bar \
"
which is how all the test cases were written.
This patch fixes that bug and adds and fixes a test that matched the bugs
behavior rather than the expected behavior.
(Bitbake rev: 14f05cbdc2ad8d59a94af1c8816567d93c39c88c)
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Make the following improvements to edit_bblayers_conf():
* Support ~ in BBLAYERS entries
* Handle where BBLAYERS items are added over multiple lines with +=
instead of one single long item
Also add some comments documenting the function arguments and return
values as well as a set of bitbake-selftest tests.
(This function is used by the bitbake-layers add, remove and
layerindex-fetch subcommands, as well as devtool when adding the
workspace layer).
(Bitbake rev: e9a0858023c7671e30cc8ebb08496304b7f26b31)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix several bugs and add some useful enhancements to make this into a
more generic metadata editing function:
* Support modifying function values (name must be specified ending with
"()")
* Support dropping values by returning None as the new value
* Split out edit_metadata() function to provide same functionality
on a list/iterable
* Pass operation to callback and allow function to return them
* Pass current output lines to callback so they can be modified
* Fix handling of single-quoted values
* Handle :=, =+, .=, and =. operators
* Support arbitrary indent string
* Support indenting by length of assignment (by specifying -1)
* Fix typo in variablename - intentspc -> indentspc
* Expand function docstring to cover arguments / usage
* Add a parameter to enable matching names with overrides applied
* Add some bitbake-selftest tests
Note that this does change the expected signature of the callback
function. The only known caller is in lib/bb/utils.py itself; I doubt
anyone else has made extensive use of this function yet.
(Bitbake rev: 20059e4d5ab9bf0f32c781ccb208da3c95818018)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add some very basic safeguard against recursively deleting paths such
as / and /home in the event of bugs or user mistakes.
Addresses [YOCTO #7620].
(Bitbake rev: 56cddeb9e1e4d249f84ccd6ef65db245636e38ea)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We've had versioned dependency support in LAYERDEPENDS for quite a long
time, but I can say with pretty good certainty that almost nobody has
used it up to now because it was too strict - the specified version had
to exactly match the version in your configuration or you would get an
error; there was no "greater than or equal" option, which is usually
what you will want given that LAYERVERSION does get bumped from time to
time.
However, users mismatching layer branches and then having their builds
fail later on with some incomprehensible error is still a pretty common
problem. We can't simply use the git branch because not everyone is
always on a branch and the branch names don't always match up (and
that's not an issue). To provide a practical means to address branch
mismatching, I have reworked LAYERDEPENDS version specifications to use
the more familiar "dependency (>= version)" syntax as used with package
dependencies, support non-integer versions, and clarified the error
message a little. If we then take care to bump the version on every
breaking change, it is at least possible to have layers depend on these
changes when they update to match; we can now even support a major.minor
scheme to allow retrospectively adding a version limiter to old branches
when a new branch is created and yet still allow the old branch minor
version to be bumped if needed.
Fixes [YOCTO #5991].
(Bitbake rev: 408be9cdf2b1e32e64ea488d8051a546fb54c144)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This scheme is used for versioning recipes that are pre-release (alpha,
beta, etc.) within OpenEmbedded, so add some tests to ensure the
appropriate comparison results still hold true.
(Bitbake rev: 3a9eefe27f29a4593d6298f0427ac5f3e9183377)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds some basic unit testing for the codeparser and data store code. Many of
the actual test cases were taken from work by Chris Larson's OE-Signatures work but with
changes to adapt to the current bitbake APIs we need to test.
I also imported CoW tests written by Holger Freyther from the original bitbake-test
codebase: http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/bitbake/trunk/bitbake-tests/tests/ and
some tests from the doctests that were removed in commit:
http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit?id=3a11c2807972bbbddffde2fa67fc380d159da467
(Bitbake rev: ae4a95780e3e08cf73c854efa8cd93379e00c4e5)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
