If you set tracking=True when creating the tinfoil object, that ensures
history is collected for the main datastore, but at the end of parsing
the configuration, history tracking gets turned off to save time with
the result that we don't collect history for any recipes we parse.
Enable tracking when we parse a recipe (and disable it afterwards if we
enabled it) in order to fix this.
This fixes functionality in OE's devtool that relies upon variable
history (such as devtool upgrade updating PV when it's set within a
recipe).
(Bitbake rev: cc8b4c81bb589fb70774a0151f87a8d277f40f06)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a task fails during build_targets(), we need to print out the log
lines as knotty does or the user will be missing information about the
failure.
(This should get some deeper refactoring, but now isn't the time for
that.)
(Bitbake rev: 24879df071d4803db3d39ae1d5cad852daa92f28)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With config_only=False we launch the UI and it sets up a logger, whereas
when config_only=True we don't, with the result that with True we are
seeing log messages from both our logger and the one set up by the UI.
Suppress our loggers with config_only=True to avoid this.
Fixes [YOCTO #11275] (again).
(Bitbake rev: b5e3b28b7c982dd8a3991d727f25710dbf58bb80)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In combination with the recent server reworking, this change actually
prevents messages sent from tasks from being logged properly. This will
of course give us the duplicated messages back, and I really hate to do
that effectively a second time, but that's better than seeing no error
at all in the case of a failure - we'll have to find the proper way of
avoiding the duplication that doesn't result in some messages going
missing.
This reverts commit 8a5bae76f91f2411187c638a42fa3c762052cf11.
(Bitbake rev: 645c8dd15762516ae5ab64a1df47fadb95d072d1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We want this API to be easier to use, so add missing function
documentation to help with that.
(Bitbake rev: 3e0e002d6497caa987f327cd83ad4db82cca6810)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
A common task for tinfoil-using scripts is to iterate over all recipes.
This isn't too difficult with the current API, but the pkg_* variables
are a little awkward and are really designed for bitbake's internal
usage - and it gets a bit more difficult when you want to access some of
the other information such as packages and rprovides. To resolve this,
create a new recipe info class and add an all_recipes() function to
generate this for all recipes. Also add a get_recipe_info() function to
get the information for a specific recipe (by PN).
(It might perhaps be suggested that we already have a structure similar
to this in the cache, however the one we add here is designed for
external use and allows the internal structures to change if needed
without affecting the API).
(Bitbake rev: 308994028e59735ca726c5d2c1f0f85baccfe89d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add access to fn_provides, packages, packages_dynamic and rproviders on
the recipecache object. This requires an additional corresponding
command plumbing to be added.
(Bitbake rev: 3df9b7c615174a6557581f3cd157842a28f6bb26)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Up to this point, if you wanted to run build tasks in the normal way
they get run from a python script, there was no other way than to shell
out to bitbake. Worse than that, you couldn't have tinfoil active during
that because only one bitbake instance could be running at once. As long
as we're prepared to handle the events produced, we can create a wrapper
around calling the buildTargets command. Borrow code from knotty to do
this in such a way that we get the expected running task display
(courtesy of TermFilter) and Ctrl+C handling.
(Bitbake rev: 43761eee756be52a1021be53a40dc591a6c35fa7)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Make it easy to determine if recipes are parsed (and thus information
about available recipes is in memory).
(Bitbake rev: 7efde2df2ff25063d36ac015146f1975284a69ff)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Python style recommends underscore based naming rather than camelCase,
and thus the former has been used for most of tinfoil's functions. Add
an underscored version of parseRecipes() for consistency and change the
one place we call it to use the new version.
(Bitbake rev: 821f6c41d850752d2bcc2ccd4f8e75b2897a0a3e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In OE's devtool we want to repeatedly run build_file() without showing
unnecessary messages and triggering buildhistory for each call.
build_file() is just a wrapper around the buildFile command. Change
the final "hidewarning" parameter of the buildFile command to "internal"
and have this call a new buildFileInternal() function without triggering
any of the normal build events, silencing the normal info messages from
the runqueue ("Executing RunQueue Tasks", "Tasks Summary" etc.) and
avoiding calling parseConfiguration() which we've already done at this
point.
(Bitbake rev: ba53e067a2d448dd63b4ca252557ce98aa8e6321)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This changes the way bitbake server works quite radically. Now, the
server is always a process based server with the option of starting
an XMLRPC listener on a specific inferface/port.
Behind the scenes this is done with a "bitbake.sock" file alongside
the bitbake.lock file. If we can obtain the lock, we know we need
to start a server. The server always listens on the socket and UIs
can then connect to this. UIs connect by sending a set of three file
descriptors over the domain socket, one for sending commands, one for
receiving command results and the other for receiving events.
These changes meant we can throw away all the horrid server abstraction
code, the plugable transport option to bitbake and the code becomes
much more readable and debuggable. It also likely removes a ton of
ways you could hang the UI/cooker in weird ways due to all the race
conditions that existed with previous processes.
Changes:
* The foreground option for bitbake-server was dropped. Just tail
the log if you really want this, the codepaths were complicated enough
without adding one for this.
* BBSERVER="autodetect" was dropped. The server will autostart and
autoconnect in process mode. You have to specify an xmlrpc server
address since that can't be autodetected. I can't see a use case
for autodetect now.
* The transport/servetype option to bitbake was dropped.
* A BB_SERVER_TIMEOUT variable is added which allows the server
to stay resident for a period of time after the last client
disconnects before unloading. This is used if the -T/--idle-timeout
option is not passed to bitbake.
This change is invasive and may well introduce new issues however I
believe the codebase is in a much better position for further
development and debugging.
(Bitbake rev: 72a3dbe13a23588e24c0baca6d58c35cdeba3f63)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Adding an additional logger in setup_bitbake() interacts poorly with the
logger we have added by default in tinfoil's constructor, with the
result that messages may be doubled or even tripled in tinfoil-using
scripts. Disable adding this one when calling setup_bitbake() from
tinfoil to avoid this problem.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #11275].
(Bitbake rev: 8a5bae76f91f2411187c638a42fa3c762052cf11)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Turn reasons from a list into a string (usually there will be only one
reason, but the interface provides for more than one) and state up
front that the recipe is unavailable for clarity
* Use quotes around invalid recipe name
(Bitbake rev: 8922f1d23400049d2894a97915a533769a24ca07)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This function calls cooker.findBestProvider() but didn't handle the fact
that that function returns a tuple (None, None, None, None) when there
is no matching recipe. (This fixes devtool in OpenEmbedded showing a
traceback when an invalid recipe is specified instead of a proper error
message.)
(Bitbake rev: 54a4757ca706afc6e98c7692f960592e80cab12b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you had a script that uses tinfoil and it failed to connect to the
BitBake server, you did't see any of the expected messages - this was
because client-side logging wasn't being handled at all. Since you'll
almost always want this when using tinfoil, have it use the new
bb.msg.logger_create() function to enable client-side logging by
default.
Relates to [YOCTO #11185].
(Bitbake rev: 824e73e0f3eaa96b4d84da7e31f9a17ce5c5d7ee)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Enable the following operations from a remote datastore to affect the
other end:
* setVarFlag()
* delVar()
* delVarFlag()
* renameVar()
In practice I don't expect these to be used much, but they should be
present so that the implementation is at least reasonably filled out
and that the tests pass.
Also add tests for the interface, mostly by subclassing the existing
local test classes so that they are using a remote datastore. (These
don't actually test remote usage via tinfoil, just that the
datastore's interface can be used.)
(Bitbake rev: 282dc0719d22a39df746eea762ebe05c66aa8f8a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There was a huge gap in the remote datastore code introduced in the
tinfoil2 rework - we weren't handling overrides at all, since these are
stored separately from the actual data in the DataSmart object. Thus,
when a datastore actually represents a remote datastore we need to go
back to that remote datastore to get the override data as well, so
introduce code to do that.
To avoid a second round-trip I had to modify the _findVar() function to
return the override data as well. This will increase the overhead a
little when that data is superfluous, but without making the function
even uglier I don't think there's a way to avoid that.
(Bitbake rev: 4f9d6f060ed247fb6fa2f45668a892a1788d3f91)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The runqueue expects to be able to run 'bitbake-worker' from PATH, but
for example in the OE extensible SDK, tinfoil is used within devtool
where this isn't the case (we're not exposing bitbake to the user, thus
bitbake's bin directory isn't in PATH).
This fixes devtool modify usage within the extensible SDK which has
apparently been broken since the tinfoil2 changes went in.
Fixes [YOCTO #11034].
(Bitbake rev: 52d87e4a58a52174e8e0b6297abaac8fd93ffcc3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we want to use this function/command internally, we don't want this
warning shown.
(Bitbake rev: 5cfbb60833e7b12d698c1c2970c17ccf2a4971bf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're expanding a value that refers to the value of a variable in
python code, we need to ensure that the datastore that gets used to get
the value of that variable is the client-side datastore and not just the
part of it that's on the server side. For example, suppose you are in
client code doing the following:
d.setVar('HELLO', 'there')
result = d.expand('${@d.getVar("HELLO", True)}')
result should be "there" but if the client part wasn't taken into
account, it would be whatever value HELLO had in the server portion of
the datastore (if any).
(Bitbake rev: cbc22a0a9aadc8606b927dbac0f1407ec2736b35)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's not really practical for us to parse recipes on the client side, we
need to do it on the server because that's where we have the full python
environment (including any "pure" python functions defined in classes).
Thus, add some functions to tinfoil do this including a few shortcut
functions.
(Bitbake rev: 8f635815d191c9d848a92d51fdbf5e9fd3da1727)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rewrite tinfoil as a wrapper around the UI, instead of the earlier
approach of starting up just enough of cooker to do what we want. This
has several advantages:
* It now works when bitbake is memory-resident instead of failing with
"ERROR: Only one copy of bitbake should be run against a build
directory".
* We can now connect an actual UI, thus you get things like the recipe
parsing / cache loading progress bar and parse error handling for free
* We can now handle events generated by the server if we wish to do so
* We can potentially extend this to do more stuff, e.g. actually running
build operations - this needs to be made more practical before we can
use it though (since you effectively have to become the UI yourself
for this at the moment.)
The downside is that tinfoil no longer has direct access to cooker, the
global datastore, or the cache. To mitigate this I have extended
data_smart to provide remote access capability for the datastore, and
created "fake" cooker and cooker.recipecache / cooker.collection adapter
objects in order to avoid breaking too many tinfoil-using scripts that
might be out there (we've never officially documented tinfoil or
BitBake's internal code, but we can still make accommodations where
practical). I've at least gone far enough to support all of the
utilities that use tinfoil in OE-Core with some changes, but I know
there are scripts such as Chris Larson's "bb" out there that do make
other calls into BitBake code that I'm not currently providing access to
through the adapters.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #5470].
(Bitbake rev: 3bbf8d611c859f74d563778115677a04f5c4ab43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Parsing a recipe is such a common task for tinfoil-using scripts, and is
a little awkward to do properly, so add an API function to do it. This
should also isolate scripts a little from future changes to the internal
code. The first user of this will be the OpenEmbedded layer index update
script.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #10192].
(Bitbake rev: 39780b1ccbd76579db0fc6fb9369c848a3bafa9d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since calling the shutdown() function is highly recommended, make
tinfoil objects a little easier to deal with by adding context manager
support - so you can do the following:
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
tinfoil.prepare(True)
...
(Bitbake rev: f59bc6be2b4af1acdcf6a1b184956b5ffd297743)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch adds the notion of supporting multiple configurations within
a single build. To enable it, set a line in local.conf like:
BBMULTICONFIG = "configA configB configC"
This would tell bitbake that before it parses the base configuration,
it should load conf/configA.conf and so on for each different
configuration. These would contain lines like:
MACHINE = "A"
or other variables which can be set which can be built in the same
build directory (or change TMPDIR not to conflict).
One downside I've already discovered is that if we want to inherit this
file right at the start of parsing, the only place you can put the
configurations is in "cwd", since BBPATH isn't constructed until the
layers are parsed and therefore using it as a preconf file isn't
possible unless its located there.
Execution of these targets takes the form "bitbake
multiconfig:configA:core-image-minimal core-image-sato" so similar to
our virtclass approach for native/nativesdk/multilib using BBCLASSEXTEND.
Implementation wise, the implication is that instead of tasks being
uniquely referenced with "recipename/fn:task" it now needs to be
"configuration:recipename:task".
We already started using "virtual" filenames for recipes when we
implemented BBCLASSEXTEND and this patch adds a new prefix to
these, "multiconfig:<configname>:" and hence avoid changes to a large
part of the codebase thanks to this. databuilder has an internal array
of data stores and uses the right one depending on the supplied virtual
filename.
That trick allows us to use the existing parsing code including the
multithreading mostly unchanged as well as most of the cache code.
For recipecache, we end up with a dict of these accessed by
multiconfig (mc). taskdata and runqueue can only cope with one recipecache
so for taskdata, we pass in each recipecache and have it compute the result
and end up with an array of taskdatas. We can only have one runqueue so there
extensive changes there.
This initial implementation has some drawbacks:
a) There are no inter-multi-configuration dependencies as yet
b) There are no sstate optimisations. This means if the build uses the
same object twice in say two different TMPDIRs, it will either load from
an existing sstate cache at the start or build it twice. We can then in
due course look at ways in which it would only build it once and then
reuse it. This will likely need significant changes to the way sstate
currently works to make that possible.
(Bitbake rev: 5287991691578825c847bac2368e9b51c0ede3f0)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Otherwise the logger gets multiple handers (and the user get duplicate
logging output) if another tinfoil instance is initialized after one is
shut down().
(Bitbake rev: 74d67be7a4b591fab2278f7c184f282d11620c62)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the PR server or indeed any other child process takes some time to
exit (which it sometimes does when saving its database), it can end up
holding bitbake.lock after the UI exits, which led to errors if you ran
bitbake commands successively - we saw this when running the PR server
oe-selftest tests in OE-Core. The recent attempt to fix this wasn't
quite right and ended up breaking memory resident bitbake. This time we
close the lock file when cooker shuts down (inside the UI process)
instead of unlocking it, and this is done in the cooker code rather than
the actual UI code so it doesn't matter which UI is in use. Additionally
we report that we're waiting for the lock to be released, using lsof or
fuser if available to list the processes with the lock open.
The 'magic' in the locking is due to all spawned subprocesses of bitbake
holding an open file descriptor to the bitbake.lock. It is automatically
unlocked when all those fds close the file (as all the processes terminate).
We close the UI copy of the lock explicitly, then close the server process
copy, any remaining open copy is therefore some proess exiting.
(The reproducer for the problem is to set PRSERV_HOST = "localhost:0"
and add a call to time.sleep(20) after self.server_close() in
lib/prserv/serv.py, then run "bitbake -p; bitbake -p" ).
Cleanup work done by Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>.
This reverts bitbake commit 69ecd15aece54753154950c55d7af42f85ad8606 and
e97a9f1528d77503b5c93e48e3de9933fbb9f3cd.
(Bitbake rev: a29780bd43f74b7326fe788dbd65177b86806fcf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
One drawback to tinfoil is that once a cooker is created, it will hold
the cooker lock and stop any other bitbake execution against a directory.
Add a shutdown method to tinfoil, allowing other users to use
the build directory after the tinfoil usage is no longer needed.
(Bitbake rev: e44ce85fe551677fc0dcc1da4f789a0c13093ff1)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Moved most of functionality of bin/bitbake to lib/bb/main.py
to be able to call bitbake from python code.
(Bitbake rev: d377f7f88d73f4e5d2dffef03d6acee809827ac6)
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Unfortunately it seems like the external use of the cooker
enableDataTracking() function broke at some point since the code that
reads it now runs within BBCooker's constructor. Since this now has to
be done early, add a parameter to Tinfoil's constructor to allow
enabling variable history tracking.
Fixes [YOCTO #6676].
(Bitbake rev: a9439b136f55f3f0e80ff053cd3b159da69ba362)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Originally it seemed like a good idea to keep the parameters around. Having
seen this in real life use, its incorrect, we should pull all the data we need
into the cooker's configuguration and then use this to build the datastore.
Being able to just build the datastore from the parameters seemed like a good
idea but having a dummy cooker configuration object is now looking like
the better option.
This also fixes failures in hob since the parseFiles command can call
into cooker directly now and reset the configuration prefiles and postfiles
at will, rather than the indirect calls before which were breaking the datastore
(e.g. BBPATH wasn't set).
The cleanup this allows in tinfoil illustrates how this change makes more sense.
(Bitbake rev: f50df5b891bf318f12fc61c74adfcc626cc6f836)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix the code here for recent changes to the initialisation of
configuration objects for cooker.
(Bitbake rev: 9d3ca9aa73a448b0594f03ac8e8317403ec0dc8d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rather than only handling sys.stdout, also support any arbitrary file object,
and enable color for the formatter if that file is a tty.
(Bitbake rev: c46db4be4cc4dc53376ed3f574b2f1c868730f2a)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
