It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
(From OE-Core rev: 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
(From OE-Core rev: 5ec6d9ef309b841cdcbf1d14ac678d106d5d888a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When using PATCHTOOL = "git", the user of the system is not really the
committer - it's the build system itself. Thus, specify "dummy" values
for username and email instead of using the user's configured values.
Various parts of the devtool code that need to make commits have also
been updated to use the same logic.
This allows PATCHTOOL = "git" and devtool to be used on systems where
git user.name / user.email has not been set (on versions of git where
it doesn't default a value under this circumstance).
If you want to return to the old behaviour where the externally
configured user name / email are used, set the following in your
local.conf:
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME = ""
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL = ""
Fixes [YOCTO #8703].
(From OE-Core rev: 765a9017eaf77ea3204fb10afb8181629680bd82)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The --wilcard-version flag was only used in the srcrev variant of the
update-recipe command.
(From OE-Core rev: d3057cba0b01484712fcee3c52373c143608a436)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Unfortunately to implenent multiconfig support in bitbake some APIs
had to change. This updates code in OE to match the changes in bitbake.
Its mostly periperhal changes around devtool/recipetool
[Will need a bitbake version requirement bump which I'll make when merging]
(From OE-Core rev: 041212fa37bb83acac5ce4ceb9b7b77ad172c5c3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
(From OE-Core rev: fa550fcb9333d59b28fc0e4aebde888831410f5c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to update the recipe
or create the bbappend depending on the destination.
(From OE-Core rev: 5067cdc73483b53d46d9bf584723e41957c7ec54)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to reset the recipe
at the end.
(From OE-Core rev: b8d398516556eaf97679e28ad58448f570984b52)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If there are files in the oe-local-files directory which are identical
to the original version, then we shouldn't be copying them to the
destination layer. This is particularly important when using the -a
option to create a bbappend.
(From OE-Core rev: 9230bfcc839eb35630949f0a8ed058ca1fa944b1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool update-recipe was defaulting to the ${BPN} named directory when
adding patches next to a recipe, but that meant if you already had files
in a ${BP} named directory (i.e. name and version) or "files" then you'd
end up with two directories next to the recipe, which is usually not
what you want. To avoid this, look through FILESPATH and take the first
one that's the same level or one level down from the recipe and already
exists, if any.
(From OE-Core rev: c7a8190cf8bdf86ba850b6780b8e951e90232c06)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is currently possible to specify a file (e.g. a tarball) on the local
disk as the source, but you have to know to put file:// in front of it.
There's really no need to force users to jump through that hoop if they
really want to do this so check if the specified source is a file and
prefix it with file:// if that's the case.
Also ensure the same works for "devtool add" at the same time.
(From OE-Core rev: 71350003790c38e84b0e525a71a2fe5d24e3d083)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Certain recipes cannot be used with devtool extract / modify / upgrade -
usually because they don't provide any source. Return a specific exit
code (4) so that scripts such as scripts/contrib/devtool-stress.py know
the difference between this and a genuine failure.
(From OE-Core rev: ffd295fed4ab81fc0bd00bb145ef4d72c49584bf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were attempting to open the recipe file unconditionally here - we
need to account for the possibility that the recipe file has been
deleted or moved away by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 47822a2aff56fd338c16b5ad756feda9f395a8a1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In OE-Core revision 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc I changed
the default update-recipe behaviour to only update patches for commits
that were changed; unfortunately I failed to handle the --initial-rev
option which was broken after that point. Rework how the initial
revision is passed in so that it now operates correctly.
(From OE-Core rev: b2ca2523cc9e51a4759b4420b07b0b67b3f5ac43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow specifying more than one recipe on the devtool reset command line.
Also tweak the help text slightly.
(From OE-Core rev: ad92ed8e4f7f48a3d212962531d596b36f6b284f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Converted return value of items() keys() and values() to
lists when dictionary is modified in the loop and when
the result is added to the list.
(From OE-Core rev: 874a269eb1d70060c2f3b3f8b70800e2aea789f4)
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
(From OE-Core rev: d022b4335100612d6596cc4c4956cb98ed5873cc)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Iterators now return views, not lists in python3. Where we need
lists, handle this explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: caebd862bac7eed725e0f0321bf50793671b5312)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If fetching source from a git repository, typically within OpenEmbedded
we encourage setting SRCREV to a fixed revision, so change to do that by
default and add a -a/--autorev option to use "${AUTOREV}" instead.
(From OE-Core rev: 000480c42797dd2f03ebc3bc6d1dabfc6a7b75f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Strictly speaking we ought to explicitly shut down a tinfoil instance
when we're done with it. This doesn't affect modify's operation but is
important if you want to be able to call into modify() from another
plugin (though anyone doing so should be advised that the function is
by no means a stable API and is subject to change in future releases).
(From OE-Core rev: 626dbadf22b57a22a8f8b9d1957937120f4ba4d5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we add from a fetched URL we are supposed to turn the resulting
source tree into a git repository (if it isn't already one). However, we
were using the older deprecated option name here instead of the
positional argument, so "devtool add -f <url>" resulted in the repo
being created but "devtool add <url>" didn't, which was wrong.
Also update the oe-selftest tests to check that this worked.
(From OE-Core rev: a7b6b1f8cc1c096724f794ac9dee312b0f771f66)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The npm class just installs whatever is in ${S}; if you're using
externalsrc in conjunction with it the symlinks (oe-workdir and oe-logs
by default) plus singletask.lock will end up in the final package, which
isn't really right. Introduce a variable so we know the path the files
will be installed into within npm.bbclass, and append to do_install
within the workspace bbappend to delete the files.
(From OE-Core rev: 766845e06db9d7d595e836ea1364c16fa132a413)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Otherwise (if the symlink is named .config) kernel build considers
source tree as dirty and fails.
[YOCTO #9270]
(From OE-Core rev: d36699b28c661880957d744420df9e23cdd76957)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow plugins to create additional files to go alongside the recipe. The
plugins don't know what the output filename is going to be, so they need
to put the files in a temporary location and add them to an "extrafiles"
dict within extravalues where the destination filename is the key and
the temporary path is the value.
devtool add was also extended to ensure these files get moved in and
preserved upon reset if they've been edited by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 334b9451111b7e3efbb43b3a4eecebcab8ec6f0e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you for example ran devtool modify virtual/libusb0 without specifying
a source tree path, the default was <workspace>/sources/virtual/libusb0
which isn't correct - it should be using the mapped name i.e.
libusb-compat (in the default OE-Core configuration). Reorder some of
the code to ensure that the mapped name is used.
(From OE-Core rev: c51736df17da8e6e561dd5b7ce59cb08254da870)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As suggested by Khem Raj.
(From OE-Core rev: 36cc6b81d0281348a0f241a80ddd427745a6a678)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Create config fragment if the user makes modifications to kernel config.
User may change .config e.g. by directly editing it or by running the
'do_menuconfig' bitbake task. Devtool generates one monolithic fragment
by simply doing a diff between .config and .config.baseline files in the
source directory. If either of these files is missing, the config
fragment is not gerenrated or updated. The output is a file,
'devtool-fragment.cfg' that gets added to SRC_URI in the recipe (as well
as copied into the 'oe-local-files' directory if that is present in the
source tree).
${S}/.config will be a symlink to ${B}/.config. We need to do this as
devtool is not able to access ${B} because ${B} is set in a .bbappend in
the workspace layer which is not parsed by devtool itself.
[YOCTO #8999]
(From OE-Core rev: 524da136e5b837a60682516ac08f3092c635e934)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Copy kernel config is copied to the source directory at a later phase in
_extract_source() so that it gets copied when devtool sync is done, too.
(From OE-Core rev: ff895be7a46c4b3b1b791e5387490d90bb34fce2)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I should have adjusted this in OE-Core commit
80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac where the behaviour changed.
(From OE-Core rev: 13409a2b899bb74b8060c840b8c7ef8759d099cb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting
to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular
order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those
modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as
being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands
and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of
the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no
built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add,
but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be
extended by any plugin as desired.
To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group=
parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify
an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the
list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to
force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use
subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and
optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers
appear first).
(From OE-Core rev: e1b9d31e6ea3c254ecfe940fe795af44761e0e69)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we didn't make any changes to the file then there's no point warning
the user that we have done.
(From OE-Core rev: 391b9ba30d802ac420ddf382588e03e718861c01)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If files had been created next to the recipe (for example devtool add,
edit the source and commit and then devtool update-recipe), running
devtool reset failed to preserve those files and gave an error due
to trying to rmdir the directory containing them which wasn't empty.
Fix the preservation of files in the "attic" directory properly so
we catch anything under the directory for the recipe, and replicate
the same structure in the attic directory rather than slightly
flattening it as we were before.
(From OE-Core rev: bbe63eb97ae7f78959f117d6066ef821c4da1c77)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There is no -N/--name option for devtool, that's a recipetool option -
with devtool you just specify the name as a positional argument.
(From OE-Core rev: d2bc0cba5ca8a7220ffe1ef96acf856fe972ce7c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix a regression introduced in in OE-Core revision
aedfc5a5db1c4b2b80a36147c9a13b31764d91dd where specifying a local source
tree without specifying a name resulted in a traceback.
Fixes [YOCTO #9086].
(From OE-Core rev: 67ea9d21f20a371a0ee443b46326018cb1527b62)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's going to be more common for users not to have the prepared source
tree for a recipe already, so the default behaviour ought to be to
extract it for them from the recipe. Change the default to extract
(effectively making the -x option a no-op) and add a --no-extract/-n
option to disable it. Later we can look at trying to be smart and
reusing an existing source tree instead of erroring out if it exists;
for now this is just the default reversal.
(From OE-Core rev: 80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting source for a recipe, if there are additional custom
tasks run that make changes to the source, create a commit in the
generated git branch so they are contained. This is particularly
useful for tasks that come before do_patch since otherwise the changes
might get incorporated in the first applied patch, but otherwise it
helps avoid the tree being dirty at any point.
Fixes [YOCTO #7626].
(From OE-Core rev: 997a77d9b20af1778b804778e5d8c8a7424f7582)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we run the tasks required to extract the source for a recipe (e.g.
within "devtool modify" or "devtool extract") if one of those tasks
fails you get a bb.build.FuncFailed exception; handle this properly so
you don't see a traceback.
(From OE-Core rev: 95d8631b3bdf216001e57f48277535c65a4cc49e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a recipe generated by "devtool add" has been modified since then when
you run "devtool reset", it will be moved into the "attic" subdirectory
of the workspace in case those modifications need to be preserved. It
seems natural that if those modifications were worth preserving we
should warn the user if such a file exists when they run "devtool add"
to create the same recipe again, so they can pick up where they left off
if they want to.
(From OE-Core rev: 0a39b907ff997c3a62c92ab22325c726b612de5b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
standard.py is getting a bit large; move the "utility" commands to
another module.
(From OE-Core rev: 5089b93f5b341dc28c343f7afe15efda2081ed36)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes you don't want to build an entire project, just a subdirectory
of it; add a --src-subdir option to make that easier. (We still look for
a single subdirectory in what gets unpacked, e.g. what you might find
within a tarball, so whatever you specify with this option is added onto
the end of that.)
(From OE-Core rev: 59682d78f95732e014f78f13e0a05f843860d9bb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the recipe file itself was created in the workspace, and it uses
BBCLASSEXTEND (e.g. through devtool add --also-native), then we need to
clean the other variants as well.
(From OE-Core rev: e1bf6a30679a83d4dbcf37276204f639541e95f9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We're doing this in a couple of places, let's just find the recipe file
if it exists within the workspace (which it will if it's been added
through "devtool add") when we read in the workspace.
(From OE-Core rev: 81cf5580993c99050e3f4d6d891bc67534721487)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes you need to build a variant of a recipe for the build
host as well as for the target (i.e. BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"); add a
--also-native command line option to "recipetool create" that enables
this and plumb it through from an identical option for "devtool add".
(We could conceivably do the same for nativesdk, but I felt it might be
confusing within the context of the extensible SDK, where nativesdk
isn't really relevant to the user.)
(From OE-Core rev: f3bea83db173cce921a9a30f04e88b7e3ed98854)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We need to run the clean for all recipes that are being reset before we
start deleting things from the workspace; if we don't, recipes providing
dependencies may be missing when we come to clean a recipe later (since
we don't and couldn't practically reset them in dependency order). This
also improves performance since we have the startup startup time for the
clean just once rather than for every recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: c10a2de75a99410eb5338dd6da0e0b0e32bae6f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Much of this was copy/pasted from the extract subcommand code; make it
specific to sync.
(From OE-Core rev: 08ca966dd48db881d8bfb7d7fa0aba49f1f7cffe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We deliberately leave the source tree alone when resetting in case it
contains any work in progress belonging to the user; tell them that
we're doing this so they aren't surprised about it still existing later
on.
(From OE-Core rev: 1c616802ba2cfb37f8403f1dc6cf91ce3bd99ac2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a recipe in the workspace actually exists as a file within the
workspace (e.g. after doing "devtool add" or "devtool upgrade") then
show the path to the recipe file on the status line for the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 29833828a90c8433af3b231b50e99cd97edf19ff)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
