When creating a recipe using devtool, a workspace is created to store
the new recipe, the recipe source and some append files. These append
files are used by devtool to build the recipe using externalsrc (to use
the source which are in the workspace). They can also have some
additional actions according to the class of the recipe.
This commit updates the append file for the npm recipes. The
devtool / externalsrc files are removed in the npm package directory
instead of the install directory.
(From OE-Core rev: a213a76e56e9bc215a61399ae35a3602863f5850)
Signed-off-by: Jean-Marie LEMETAYER <jean-marie.lemetayer@savoirfairelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit renames the '--fetch-dev' option into '--npm-dev' as it is a
npm only option.
(From OE-Core rev: 2b75cc848ceebee4067788a621299bfd5fb62231)
Signed-off-by: Jean-Marie LEMETAYER <jean-marie.lemetayer@savoirfairelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 41d225f4a3.
Unfortunately this change broke 'devtool upgrade' functionality,
causing 'devtool finish' to write out an upgraded recipe that no
longer includes the original upstream source in SRC_URI.
(From OE-Core rev: 2d6e55192dba0bf7f6e23e5ab5b3dbc68835bb28)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Enable --remove-work option for devtool reset command that allows user
to clean up source directory within workspace.
Currently devtool reset command only removes recipes and user is forced
to manually remove the sources directory within the workspace before
running devtool modify again.
Using devtool reset -r or devtool reset --remove-work option, user can
cleanup the sources directory along with the recipe instead of manually
cleaning it.
syntax: devtool reset -r <recipename>
Ex: devtool reset -r zip
devtool finish -r <recipename> <layer-name>
Ex: devtool finish -r zip meta-yocto-bsp
(From OE-Core rev: 0d6dd01b8633ad63d77c24568a4b20852aaa366f)
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
All devtool commands right now are filtering out the devtool workspace
bbappends in build/workspace/appends when calling parse_recipe. While
this may make sense for devtool add and modify, we need devtool finish
to include those appends.
A specific breakage that is caused because devtool finish filters devtool
appends is the cmake/cml1 flow where a file is created in the WORKDIR
that finish needs access to, to commit those files. Particularly for
git packages with SRCPV in PV, SRCPV is only changed to 999 when using
external source, hence when creating the cfg or cmake config files using
for instance bitbake -c diffconfig, these files are created in the
git999 workdir correctly (as in the devtool bbapends, we are inheriting
externalsrc class). But when devtool finish is run, the devtool appends
are not parsed, hence SRCPV is not changed to 999 and devtool is looking
for the fragment files in the wrong WORKDIR.
Changing the parse_recipe call just in devtool finish to not filter out
the devtool workspace.
Fixes [YOCTO #13533]
(From OE-Core rev: aa94f00eec64ef936acc80dfa826fd309daa294f)
Signed-off-by: Jaewon Lee <jaewon.lee@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This works just like the already existing --no-clean option to the
`devtool reset` command.
(From OE-Core rev: 4433d3133ce53cdf7db17f5e7914fe8c4d78dba3)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The _get_patchset_revs() function returns the patches in an
OrderedDict to keep them ordered. However, this information was lost
when the patches were added to the bbappend file.
(From OE-Core rev: 69b7a2ba3af1280cc220ab236032f8466246ee93)
Signed-off-by: Niclas Svensson <niclas.svensson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting the sources for a recipe that has S == WORKDIR and no
local files in the SRC_URI (which, e.g., can happen for a recipe with
a URI that has the unpack=false attribute), the extraction fails with
the following backtrace:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".../scripts/devtool", line 344, in <module>
ret = main()
File ".../scripts/devtool", line 331, in main
ret = args.func(args, config, basepath, workspace)
File ".../poky/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py", line 762, in
modify
initial_rev, _ = _extract_source(srctree, args.keep_temp,
args.branch, False, config, basepath, workspace,
args.fixed_setup, rd, tinfoil, no_overrides=args.no_overrides)
File ".../poky/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py", line 647, in
_extract_source
bb.process.run('git %s commit -a -m "Committing local file
symlinks\n\n%s"' % (' '.join(useroptions),
oe.patch.GitApplyTree.ignore_commit_prefix), cwd=srctree)
File ".../poky/bitbake/lib/bb/process.py", line 178, in run
raise ExecutionError(cmd, pipe.returncode, stdout, stderr)
bb.process.ExecutionError: Execution of 'git commit -a -m
"Committing local file symlinks
%% ignore"' failed with exit code 1:
On branch devtool
nothing to commit, working tree clean
This is because no files were found in the oe-local-files directory
and consequently no symbolic links were added using `git add`, but the
`git commit` command was still executed.
(From OE-Core rev: 3fdf304e72a1fb5de8bf9bc21e5b598fefb08648)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
All packages that support the menuconfig task will be able to run
devtool menuconfig command. This would allow the user to modify the
current configure options and create a config fragment which can be
added to a recipe using devtool finish.
1. The patch checks if devtool menuconfig command is called for a valid
package.
2. It checks for oe-local-files dir within source and creates one if
needed, this directory is needed to store the final generated config
fragment so that devtool finish can update the recipe.
3. Menuconfig command is called for users to make necessary changes.
After saving the changes, diffconfig command is run to generate the
fragment.
Syntax:
devtool menuconfig <package name>
Ex: devtool menuconfig linux-yocto
The config fragment is saved as devtool-fragment.cfg within
oe-local-files dir.
Ex:
<workspace_path>/sources/linux-yocto/oe-local-files/devtool-fragment.cfg
Run devtool finish to update the recipe by appending the config fragment
to SRC_URI and place a copy of the fragment within the layer where the
recipe resides.
Ex: devtool finish linux-yocto meta
[YOCTO #10416]
(From OE-Core rev: 417feb559a74b367315e8658d6ba868a4f8d1340)
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If kernel source is not already downloaded i.e staging kernel dir is
empty, place a copy of the source when the user runs devtool modify
linux-yocto. This way the kernel source is available for other packages
that use it.
[YOCTO #10416]
(From OE-Core rev: bb42ab90835e8ec2f1dfbb35056c353784693266)
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In the regular devtool modify flow, the kernel source is fetched by
running do_fetch task. This is an overhead in time and space.
This patch updates modify command to check if the kernel source is
already downloaded. If so, then instead of calling do_fetch, copy the
source from work-shared to devtool workspace by creating hard links
else run the usual devtool modify flow and call do_fetch task.
[YOCTO #10416]
(From OE-Core rev: 3c3a9bae296f849dbfe03942282f44036e6fa1fb)
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently `devtool finish RECIPE meta' will silently succeed even
if there are multiple layers having the same base name of 'meta'.
e.g. meta layer from oe-core and meta layer from meta-secure-core.
We should at least give user a warning in such case. With the patch,
we will get warning like below.
WARNING: Multiple layers have the same base name 'meta', use the first one '<PROJ_DIR>/oe-core/meta'.
WARNING: Consider using path instead of base name to specify layer:
<PROJ_DIR>/oe-core/meta
<PROJ_DIR>/meta-secure-core/meta
(From OE-Core rev: 2c8740f543c38dbaef3345e40827ef48b3f75405)
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds SPDX license headers in place of the wide assortment of things
currently in our script headers. We default to GPL-2.0-only except for the
oeqa code where it was clearly submitted and marked as MIT on the most part
or some scripts which had the "or later" GPL versioning.
The patch also drops other obsolete bits of file headers where they were
encoountered such as editor modelines, obsolete maintainer information or
the phrase "All rights reserved" which is now obsolete and not required in
copyright headers (in this case its actually confusing for licensing as all
rights were not reserved).
More work is needed for OE-Core but this takes care of the bulk of the scripts
and meta/lib directories.
The top level LICENSE files are tweaked to match the new structure and the
SPDX naming.
(From OE-Core rev: f8c9c511b5f1b7dbd45b77f345cb6c048ae6763e)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The cml1 and ccmake bbclasses generate configuration fragment source
files that must be exported from the WORKDIR as a source file to be
preserved across builds. This change adds detection of the current
recipes inherited classes and for cml1 and ccmake classes checks for the
specific generated configuration fragment files. These files are then
exported by devtool and included as SRC_URI files from within the target
layer.
(From OE-Core rev: 7a1fabe4a24552ce8a50c8d6009969ca52a5fd27)
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nathan@nathanrossi.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
do_patch rule of SDK's workspace/appends/linux-*.bbhappend may fail if script are not written in Python
that was the case with Phytec's BSP, the fix was to replace the do_patch rule with :
do_patch[noexec]="1" when the file was generated in scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py
(From OE-Core rev: e51cb385e5573c7069de6e8308b9b68eb4a3a162)
Signed-off-by: Yann CARDAILLAC <yann.cardaillac@smile.fr>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The check_commits logic assumes that both devtool-base and args.branch
exist in the git repo that it is operating on. In order to prevent
errors at that point it's best to first ensure that both of these refs
actually exist. If they don't both exist then the check_commits logic
should just be skipped, as it would be if the repo wasn't originally
checked out by devtool.
Previously if a user removed the args.branch branch from their devtool
cloned repo this code would crash on adding the repo with -n. The crash
would look like this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/devtool", line 344, in <module>
ret = main()
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/devtool", line 331, in main
ret = args.func(args, config, basepath, workspace)
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py", line 812, in modify
(stdout, _) = bb.process.run('git log devtool-base..%s' % branch, cwd=srctree)
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/process.py", line 178, in run
raise ExecutionError(cmd, pipe.returncode, stdout, stderr)
bb.process.ExecutionError: Execution of 'git log devtool-base..devtool' failed with exit code 128:
fatal: ambiguous argument 'devtool-base..devtool': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
(From OE-Core rev: f13a3490fdb404bbd4c77e45b83540d6deec1358)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
DEVTOOL_EXTRA_OVERRIDES only needs one entry for each instance of
overrides. Previous to these changes it would find every override to
SRC_URI and add it to the list. This would duplicate instances where
SRC_URI is modified multiple times with the same override like:
SRC_URI_append_foo += "file://0001-foo.patch"
SRC_URI_append_foo += "file://0002-bar.patch"
A bbappend might also overwrite a SRC_URI override, which would also
cause multiple instances to occur.
When there are multiple instances of the same override in
DEVTOOL_EXTRA_OVERRIDES it causes devtool modify to fail when creating
override branches. The failure occurs when attempting to create the same
override branch a second time and looks like this:
The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was:
File: 'exec_python_func() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function: <module>
0001:
*** 0002:devtool_post_patch(d)
0003:
File: '/build/poky/meta/classes/devtool-source.bbclass', lineno: 202, function: devtool_post_patch
0198:
0199: for override in extra_override_list:
0200: localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
0201: if override in default_overrides:
*** 0202: bb.process.run('git branch devtool-override-%s %s' % (override, devbranch), cwd=srcsubdir)
0203: else:
0204: # Reset back to the initial commit on a new branch
0205: bb.process.run('git checkout %s -b devtool-override-%s' % (initial_rev, override), cwd=srcsubdir)
0206: # Run do_patch function with the override applied
File: '/build/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/process.py', lineno: 178, function: run
0174: if not stderr is None:
0175: stderr = stderr.decode("utf-8")
0176:
0177: if pipe.returncode != 0:
*** 0178: raise ExecutionError(cmd, pipe.returncode, stdout, stderr)
0179: return stdout, stderr
Exception: bb.process.ExecutionError: Execution of 'git branch devtool-override-foo devtool' failed with exit code 128:
fatal: A branch named 'devtool-override-foo' already exists.
(From OE-Core rev: 90f667db2219f04e6d61588cd61056d3d8da6d7d)
Signed-off-by: Dan Dedrick <ddedrick@lexmark.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The warn method is deprecated. We should use the documented warning instead.
Quoting from the python's official doc:
"""
Note: There is an obsolete method warn which is functionally identical to warning.
As warn is deprecated, please do not use it - use warning instead.
"""
(From OE-Core rev: f467fd277eb77336097cfc0f5f329bdc8d0f70cb)
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is very useful for updating patch context so that any fuzz is eliminated.
Simply issue:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Without this flag, devtool will not deem the commits in the workspace
different to patches in the layer, even if the commits have different,
up-to-date context line in them.
(From OE-Core rev: 7e1d1887be8faaaab9996fca9a3fd750aeb7b62f)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After OE-Core rev 5e3fe00a0233d563781849a44f53885b4e924a9c we call
os.path.abspath() on the original layer path, but we later compare that
to the destination layer path. If that layer path isn't absolute but is
effectively the same path, it should be writing to the original recipe
but because we weren't making it absolute we were writing a bbappend
instead. Call os.path.abspath() on the destination path as well to avoid
that.
(From OE-Core rev: a85a78dcf226d160e9b504bfa67b306a9175ac29)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the .devtool_md5 file doesn't contain a reference to the bbappend
file (e.g. because devtool was interrupted before it could write that
out) then _check_preserve() won't delete it, so we need to delete it
separately because otherwise the recipe won't actually be reset.
(From OE-Core rev: 751d27600a3df18d96baaa48696acf33ee964bec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix two aspects of handling BBCLASSEXTENDed targets (e.g.
openssl-native) that have been run through "devtool upgrade":
* Fix recipe name not showing up in "devtool status"
* Fix "devtool reset" not deleting empty directories under the recipe
directory within the workspace, which may lead to problems if you
subsequently run "devtool upgrade" on the same target again
(From OE-Core rev: 56e04260d64de9c5b83893d97cf41b7ea9a45878)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a recipe that uses overrides to conditionally extend
SRC_URI to add additional patches, then you will often need to update
those patches if you're making other changes to the source tree (for
example if you're upgrading the underlying source). Make this possible
with devtool by creating devtool-override-* branches for each override
that conditionally appends/prepends SRC_URI, and have devtool
update-recipe / finish check each branch out in turn and update the
corresponding patches.
A current example of a recipe that does this is the quota recipe - it
applies an additional patch if musl is the selected C library (i.e.
libc-musl is in OVERRIDES).
Note that use of this functionality does require some care - in
particular, updates to patches that appear on the main branch (named
"devtool" by default) should be made there and not only on one of the
specific devtool-override-* branches that are created for each override.
The recommended procedure is to make the changes you want to make to the
main branch first, then check out and rebase each devtool-override-*
branch, testing each one by activating the corresponding configuration,
and then finally run devtool finish.
Fixes [YOCTO #11516].
(From OE-Core rev: aa87603d1ffd695027847f4df75c0406cf4e14d8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're not sure what changes devtool finish is going to make, or
you're not sure you're finished with your modifications, it is useful to
be able to see what devtool finish is going to do beforehand, so add
a -N/--dry-run option to make that possible.
(It's also very useful for debugging devtool finish itself.)
(From OE-Core rev: 05f2d5d2ce00c53825ccea5cd9c2262f9d27a638)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a file is going to be effectively removed from the destination by
devtool finish, we should report that rather than just reporting that
we're removing files from the workspace. This is a little tricky because
the way we actually operate when finishing is to:
(1) remove all original files (as recorded by devtool upgrade, if that
was used)
(2) as part of updating the recipe file, remove the files from next to
the new recipe (i.e. in the workspace for an upgrade, real recipe
otherwise) corresponding to commits not in the git tree
(3) copy over remaining files from the workspace to the destination
To report the files removed with respect to what was originally there,
we need to swap steps 1 and 2 so we can see what no longer exists after
the deletion, and suppress the reporting currently done in step 2 -
however, we still want to report removal in step 2 for the non-upgrade
case, so the latter is conditional.
(From OE-Core rev: db1d663507509cac9d97d7c96ac8590478767ba2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the files that the devtool-source class is supposed to create in the
source tree aren't found in the temporary directory then we know that
the class hasn't worked properly - say that explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: 4621152509c037532b133e5e6d5b73bda7ddb602)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the directory where the source code extracts to changes (for
example, when upgrading iucode-tool from 1.5 to 2.1.1, the subdirectory
in the tarball changed from "iucode_tool-${PV}" to "iucode-tool-${PV}")
then handle this automatically. Also handle when it changes to match the
default S value (i.e. "${WORKDIR}/${BP}") in which case we just drop
setting S in the recipe.
Fixes [YOCTO #10939].
(From OE-Core rev: d29881a652bf03627d257a1eac5f02ec17315b8b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool finish will check if the destination layer is part of
bblayers.conf so that we avoid the user getting confused about the
recipe vanishing from their configuration if it isn't. devtool finish
also accepts a path underneath a layer so that you have a bit
more control over where it ends up. However if you used a path
underneath a layer then it wasn't converting this to the base of the
layer before checking it against BBLAYERS, thus the warning was being
shown erroneously in that case.
(From OE-Core rev: ab1b8d55e551fea3e8656aab7a786d1bfec62d0f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the git repository for a recipe in the workspace has uncommitted
changes in it then it's possible that the user has forgotten to commit
something, so check and exit if there are any. Provide a -f/--force
option to continue in the case where the uncommitted changes aren't
needed.
Separately, if the repository is in the middle of a rebase or git am /
apply then error out (without the opportunity to force) since the user
really needs to sort this out before finishing.
(From OE-Core rev: bfebd18982c0c82ef2da63ec8f22175c93b2e308)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then print that rather than the subdirectory path when
telling the user they need to remove the source tree, since that is the
directory that they will need to remove.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e8808099046478e98c6cf1903dc6787d69132fc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Show a warning in devtool upgrade if the version is less than the
current version suggesting that the user may need to bump PE in the
recipe
* Show a warning in devtool add and devtool upgrade if the version looks
like a pre-release version suggesting using a version number that
won't mess up the progression when you come to upgrade to the final
release version.
(From OE-Core rev: 92c4d9be9ed365c449ea1ac5a18ddb15e4a36b2d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then we weren't handling the oe-local-files directory
properly - it got extracted to the base of the tree but devtool
update-recipe and devtool finish assumed it would be under S which would
be the subdirectory, thus it would be missing and devtool would assume
the files had been deleted and remove them from the recipe. Record the
base of the source tree in the bbappend and read it into the in-memory
workspace so we can use that to find out where oe-local-files should be
found.
(From OE-Core rev: 30d2ea67b2c4727e23d06a35745b1afa64b130cc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If SRCREV contains a variable reference, any devtool command that
would try to update it would fail. E.g., if SRCREV = "R${PV}", then
devtool finish without having committed any changes would fail with:
oe.patch.CmdError: Command Error: 'sh -c 'git format-patch R${PV} -o
/tmp/oepatchb_doareb -- .'' exited with 0 Output:
fatal: bad revision 'R'
(From OE-Core rev: 094499c819722ad698ccb64ec65dd439b211c31c)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Alongside reworking the way devtool extracts source, we now need to
ensure that within the extensible SDK where task signatures are locked,
the signatures of the tasks for the recipes being worked on get unlocked
at the right time or otherwise we'll now get taskhash mismatches when
running devtool modify on a recipe that was included in the eSDK such as
the kernel (due to a separate bug). The existing mechanism for
auto-unlocking recipes was a little weak and was happening too late, so
I've reimplemented it so that:
(a) it gets triggered immediately when the recipe/append is created
(b) we avoid writing to the unlocked signatures file unnecessarily
(since it's a global configuration file) and
(c) within the eSDK configuration we whitelist SIGGEN_UNLOCKED_RECIPES
to avoid unnecessary reparses every time we perform one of the
devtool operations that does need to change this list.
Fixes [YOCTO #11883] (not the underlying cause, but this manifestation
of the issue).
(From OE-Core rev: 4e9a0be32fc30fb87d65da7cd1a4015c99533aff)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since it was first implemented, devtool's source extraction (as used by
the devtool modify, extract and upgrade subcommands) ignored other recipe
dependencies - so for example if you ran devtool modify on a recipe that
fetches from svn or is compressed using xz then it would fail if those
dependencies hadn't been built first. Now that we can execute tasks in
the normal way (i.e. tinfoil.build_targets()) then we can rework it to
use that. This is slightly tricky in that the source extraction needs to
insert some logic in between tasks; luckily we can use a helper class
that conditionally adds prefuncs to make that possible.
Some side-effects / aspects of this change worth noting:
* Operations are a little slower because we have to go through the task
dependency graph generation and other startup processing. There's not
really any way to avoid this though.
* devtool extract didn't used to require a workspace, now it does
because it needs to create a temporary bbappend for the recipe. (As
with other commands the workspace be created on the fly if it doesn't
already exist.)
* I want any existing sysroot files and stamps to be left alone during
extraction since we are running the tasks off to the side, and
especially devtool extract should be able to be used without touching
these. However, this was hampered by the automatic removal process in
sstate.bbclass triggered by bb.event.ReachableStamps when the task
signatures change, thus I had to introduce a way to disable this
removal on a per-recipe basis (we still want it to function for any
dependencies that we aren't working on). To implement this I elected
to use a file written to tmp/sstate-control which gets deleted
automatically after reading so that there's less chance of stale files
affecting future sessions. I could have used a variable but this would
have needed to be whitelisted and I'd have to have poked its value in
using the setVariable command.
Fixes [YOCTO #11198].
(From OE-Core rev: 830dbd66992cbb9e731b48d56fddf8f220349666)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
A recipe added with "devtool add" requires to be able to take precedence on recipes
previously defined with PREFERRED_PROVIDER.
By adding the parameter "--provides" to "devtool add" it is possible to specify
an element to be provided by the recipe. A devtool recipe can override a previous
PREFERRED_PROVIDER using the layer configuration file in the workspace.
E.g.
devtool add my-libgl git@git://my-libgl-repository --provides virtual/libgl
[YOCTO #10415]
(From OE-Core rev: adeea2fe6895898a5e6006e798898f0f5dabd890)
Signed-off-by: Juan M Cruz Alcaraz <juan.m.cruz.alcaraz@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sorted entries are easier to read.
(From OE-Core rev: d0a123ec564f6d36977e472f8bc63f9c050ee616)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <olani@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
At the moment when fetching source from a git repository you have to
know that you can specify the revision and branch in the URL with
';rev=' and ';branch=' respectively, and you can also get thrown off by
the shell splitting on the ; character if you forget to surround the URL
in quotes. Add explicit -S/--srcrev and -B/--srcbranch options
(consistent with devtool upgrade) to make this easier for the user to
discover and use. (The rev and branch URL parameters will continue to
work, however.)
(From OE-Core rev: 2d86cac853d6daa496c0315a5cb0662ebf1165b0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Patches that we identify as having been "deleted" (i.e. patches in
SRC_URI that no longer appear in the git tree) need to be dropped even
if we're updating in srcrev mode. This fixes the case where HEAD of the
git tree is valid upstream (i.e. no extra commits), but there are
patches left over in the recipe, e.g. when we do devtool upgrade and
then all of the commits rebased on top of the new branch get skipped.
Fixes [YOCTO #11972].
(From OE-Core rev: 350f83dc1e317aeb93539f13966caca6d894f569)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In case the proposed md5sum to be appended to the .devtool_md5 file
is already present, do not append it.
(From OE-Core rev: f958c5cba3b0d24ca696b2b707857009c9a7b5b8)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* If an error is logged while executing a task, we need to ensure we
exit instead of assuming everything went OK.
* If we receive CookerExit, the server is shutting down and we need to
stop waiting for events and probably exit (knotty does this). This
will occur if an exception or bb.fatal() happens during an event
handler.
This fixes a couple of issues highlighted when using devtool upgrade or
modify on a non-supported recipe with intel-iot-refkit together with
bitbake master, but I'd be very surprised if it were hard to reproduce
in other scenarios.
(From OE-Core rev: 65e644368fc9c294af96906528ee0cf30305e0a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since we have provide an option to manually enable PREMIRRORS and MIRRORS
in recipetool, we need to make sure devtool is having the same options
as devtool uses recipetool in creating new recipes.
(From OE-Core rev: 198bddeb928a318c3ad168bcb4f83b5cd9a604fb)
Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Across devtool and recipetool we had an ugly set of code for ensuring
that we can call an npm binary, and much of that ugliness was a result
of not being able to run build tasks when tinfoil was active - if
recipetool found that npm was required and we didn't know beforehand
(e.g. we're fetching from a plain git repository as opposed to an npm://
URL where it's obvious) then it had to exit and return a special result
code, so that devtool knew it needed to build nodejs-native and then
call recipetool again. Now that we are using real build tasks to fetch
and unpack, we can drop most of this and move the code to the one place
where it's still needed (i.e. create_npm where we potentially have to
deal with node.js code in a plain source repository).
(From OE-Core rev: 8450de16ddb02d863204b411a94c6d84e0f88817)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting linux-yocto kernel source, we don't need to dance around
shutting down and starting up tinfoil anymore, we can just execute the
tasks as needed when needed using tinfoil's new build_targets()
function. This allows us to tidy up the code structure a bit.
(From OE-Core rev: 5c7f5031023fb74b5f2f26d6b3c829981f2f54d2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If for any reason the parse_recipe fail in extract command
the process gets locked because Cooker is expecting the
finish event by tinfoil.
For example:
$ devtool extract remake /tmp/remake
ERROR: remake is unavailable:
remake was skipped: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/make set to make, not remake
(From OE-Core rev: 2c0062b59178fa668b26487b6d2f1e81a0d868e0)
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Perf is a tool build from the kernel source, which is normally available
in /work-shared/..., but when devtool is used to modify the kernel
source code, perf is not buildable since it gets an error about being unable
to add a depends to a non-exisit task do_patch.
This patch removes do_patch from the SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS and creates an empty
do_patch task to enable the VarFlags code to have someplace to attach depends
information to.
[YOCT #11120]
(From OE-Core rev: 86c793595e560e7bc52e3cd2a2752746e6adcb76)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is a non-existent event - we already have the actual
bb.build.TaskSucceeded further down in the list hence why it wasn't
noticed earlier.
(From OE-Core rev: 4e059a5ceb6f44401154e89e37f56de1d664a7cb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a task such as do_fetch fails when we're extracting source for a
recipe (within devtool modify / upgrade / extract / sync) then we should
naturally stop processing instead of blundering on; in order to do that
we need to be listening for the TaskFailed event. Thanks to Richard
Purdie for noticing and fixing this.
(From OE-Core rev: 9174b845bf6a6be7753bf6b921959b1f3f2dcbc0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Most of the other extract-based commands have this option but oddly I
left it out for modify - I guess because if I was debugging an issue here
I just used devtool extract to do so, but there's no reason why we can't
have it here and it is useful.
(From OE-Core rev: 98fbc46e1a51237213bd7825a922389d3ab2ad9b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If recipetool returns with exit code 14 this means devtool needs to
build nodejs-native and then call it again. If recipetool returns exit
code 14 again then clearly something has gone wrong and we should just
quit with an error.
(From OE-Core rev: 8d7cced6e06d7c2037f5ab75ac859f501129532e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The change over to recipe specific sysroots means that we can no longer
get a known location simply from configuration for the npm binary - we
need to get the recipe sysroot for nodejs-native, look there for npm if
we need to check it's present, and add that to PATH when calling out to
npm. Unfortunately this means anywhere we need to get that path we have
to have parsed all recipes, otherwise we have no reliable way of
resolving nodejs-native. Thus we have to change recipetool create to
always parse all recipes (the structure of the code does not allow us to
do this conditionally).
In the worst case, if npm hasn't already been added to its own sysroot
and we are fetching from a source repository rather than an npm
registry, this gets a bit ugly because we end up parsing recipes three
times:
1) recipetool startup, which then fetches the code and determines it's
a node.js module, finds that npm isn't available and then exits with
a specific error to tell devtool it needs to build npm
2) when we invoke bitbake -c addto_recipe_sysroot nodejs-native
3) when we re-invoke recipetool
This code is badly in need of refactoring, but now is unfortunately not
the time to do that, so we're going to have to live with this ugliness
for now.
Fixes [YOCTO #10992].
(From OE-Core rev: acfdbd796c99882b8586023c8c6b848716105c8d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When devtool writes to the kconfig fragment, it writes the output of
the diff command returned from pipe.communicate(). This function
returns binary objects. We should open the kconfig fragment file in
binary mode if we expect to write binary objects to it.
[YOCTO #11171]
(From OE-Core rev: 72bec63ab0e78753fb6ed1794d11beef9485c014)
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Web applications built using e.g. angular2, usually requires that the
packages in devDependencies are available.
Thus, add an option '--fetch-dev' to both devtool add and recipetool, to
add npm packages in devDependencies to DEPENDS.
(From OE-Core rev: f246f820d53b459596fde6758a09f7a0d7db7c4c)
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With the move to tinfoil2, the behaviour when parsing failed has changed
a bit - exceptions are now raised, so handle these appropriately.
Specifically when if parsing the recipe created when running devtool add
fails, rename it to .bb.parsefailed so that the user can run bitbake
afterwards without parsing being interrupted.
(From OE-Core rev: b9592bd3c1ab2155b9f62d18ce593b9c88eff279)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting source for a recipe within devtool (for extract, modify
or upgrade) We need to redirect WORKDIR, STAMPS_DIR etc. under a
temporary directory so that:
(a) we pick up all files that get unpacked to the WORKDIR, and
(b) we don't disturb the existing build
However, with recipe-specific sysroots the sysroots for the recipe will
be prepared under WORKDIR, and if we used the system temporary directory
i.e. usually /tmp) as used by mkdtemp by default, then our attempts to
hardlink files into the recipe-specific sysroots will fail on systems
where /tmp is a different filesystem, and we'd have to fall back to
copying the files which is a waste of time. Put the temp directory under
the WORKDIR to prevent that from being a problem.
(From OE-Core rev: e10a973cd9390eacb13bdb99693a0622bd3695f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
[RP: Add needed mkdirhier call]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When using devtool modify on the kernel, we have to do a bit of a dance
with tinfoil instances because we only find out that we're working on a
kernel recipe after tinfoil is initialised, but then we need to build
kern-tools-native which we're doing just by running bitbake directly.
With the tinfoil2 changes, a datastore for the recipe that we were
keeping around across the opening and closing of tinfoil is no longer
able to be used. Re-parse the recipe to avoid this problem.
(In future this whole thing will be able to be done in the same tinfoil
instance thanks to tinfoil2, but that refactoring is yet to be done.)
(From OE-Core rev: 06127d0115ba449bf04e2579cd1010065e0ed6e3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True
option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace.
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\)
(From OE-Core rev: 0a36bd96e6b29fd99a296efc358ca3e9fb5af735)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Using the setVariable commands here followed by buildFile will result in
"basehash mismatch" errors, and that's expected since we are deviating
*at runtime* from what was previously seen by changing these variable
values. Set BB_HASH_IGNORE_MISMATCH to turn off the errors.
(From OE-Core rev: b0169796f294bbec0397b7eae86454a46b68cdc5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Extracting the source for a recipe (as used by devtool's extract, modify
and upgrade subcommands) requires us to run do_fetch, do_unpack,
do_patch and any tasks that the recipe has inserted inbetween, and do so
with a modified datastore primarily so that we can redirect WORKDIR and
STAMPS_DIR in order to have the files written out to a place of our
choosing and avoid stamping the tasks as having executed in a real build
context respectively. However, this all gets much more difficult when in
memres mode since we can't call internal functions such as
bb.build.exec_func() directly - instead we need to execute the tasks on
the server. To do this we use the buildFile command which already exists
for the purpose of supporting bitbake -b, and setVariable commands to
set up the appropriate datastore.
(I did look at passing the modified datastore to the buildFile command
instead of using setVar() on the main datastore, however its use of
databuilder makes that very difficult, and we'd also need a different
method of getting the changes in the datastore over to the worker as
well.)
(From OE-Core rev: eb63b5339014fc72ba4829714e0a96a98e135ee2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If PATCHTOOL is "git", and PATCH_COMMIT_FUNCTIONS is set to "1", for
additional tasks between do_unpack and do_patch, make a git commit. This
logic was previously implemented in devtool itself, but it makes more
sense for it to be implemented in the patch class since that's where the
rest of the logic is for this (or in lib/oe/patch.py). It also makes
it possible for this to work with tinfoil2.
(From OE-Core rev: f24f59ea1d8bc335ea8576f6a346d0935f4a3548)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file() and Tinfoil.parse_recipe() instead of
the recipeutils equivalents, and replace any local duplicate
implementations. This not only tidies up the code but also allows these
calls to work in memres mode.
(From OE-Core rev: f13b56266ee96dfab65a3a7db50e8051aa9f071a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
(From OE-Core rev: 857c06d6a1d161bf5a01311d07758bd4241929a3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a patch remotely fetched in a recipe (e.g. from an http
server) that needs updating then add a local version and substitute the
entry in SRC_URI to point to it.
One can argue about how desirable it is to be modifying patches fetched
in this way, but then one can argue about how desirable it is to have
such patches in the recipe in the first place - and in any case if
devtool update-recipe is to correctly transfer changes to such patches
made in the git repository within the source tree to the recipe then
there isn't much choice but to do it this way.
(From OE-Core rev: a19c26cc78a181f9dd2706dd42e7e450d7ad4082)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
(From OE-Core rev: e47d21624dfec6f71742b837e91da553f18a28c5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As of the move to Python 3 and the fixes we applied at that time,
bb.process.run() will return a byte array of length 0 rather than an
empty string if the output is empty. That may be a bug that we should
fix, but for now it's easiest to just check the result here before
treating it as a string. This fixes running "devtool update-recipe" or
"devtool finish" on a recipe which has no source tree, for example
initramfs-framework.
Fixes [YOCTO #10563].
(From OE-Core rev: 66bf6978fc807ecc422fb6b6328f68bc3406cf15)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
(From OE-Core rev: 9303d8055c45a0f6af295d70a6f6a8b9d8d8a7c9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run devtool finish to move a recipe created in the workspace by
devtool add or devtool upgrade to a layer, and that layer is not
currently included in bblayers.conf (perhaps unintentionally), then the
recipe will no longer be visible to bitbake. In this scenario, show a
warning so that the user isn't surprised by the recipe "going missing".
(From OE-Core rev: 4da8a58e2997db4f24ae0cac0ba27259d7857a05)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If devtool finish is run on a recipe where the recipe file itself is in
the workspace (e.g. where devtool add / devtool upgrade has been used)
and the specified destination layer is not in bblayers.conf, then we
need to avoid running bitbake -c clean at the end because the recipe has
been moved, but the bbappend is still present in the workspace layer at
that point and so if we do it will fail due to the dangling bbappend.
It's difficult to do the clean at the point we'd want to because tinfoil
is holding bitbake.lock for most of the time, but in any case cleaning
the recipe is less important than it used to be since we started
managing the sysroot contents more strictly, so just disable cleaning
under these circumstances to avoid the problem.
Fixes [YOCTO #10484].
(From OE-Core rev: c6980307d43632f4172e79d9607004203af4e9c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When running devtool add, instead of hiding the recipetool create
output, change it so that it's appropriate to show in the devtool
context and show it in real-time. This means that you get status output
such as when a URL is being fetched (though currently no progress
information.) recipetool create now has a hidden --devtool option to
enable this display mode.
(From OE-Core rev: 219aec8803de4ef04c514c87ecfb15359c9424a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With recent changes to recipeutils, the list of local files returned
by get_recipe_local_files could possibly include source files. This
only happens when the recipe contains a SRC_URI using subdir= to put
files in the source tree. These files should be ignored when
populating the list of local files for oe-local-files directory.
[YOCTO #10326]
introduced in
OE-Core revision 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309
(From OE-Core rev: 31f1bbad248c36a8c86dde4ff57ce42efc664082)
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user runs devtool add on an npm:// URL (or source tree that uses
node.js), and npm is not available, just build nodejs-native instead of
telling the user they need to do it; if that fails because there isn't
any such recipe (which would be the default, since it's not in OE-Core)
then produce a slightly more readable error message hinting at what the
user needs to do.
Note that this forces the use of nodejs-native rather than npm on the
host - this makes sense for two reasons: (1) we need it to be compatible
with nodejs for the target, and (2) we have to have a recipe for that
anyway, so allowing you to avoid having a recipe for the native version
isn't really beneficial.
There's a bit of a hack in here in order to allow this - for node.js
sources that aren't fetched via npm we don't know that they are that
until we've fetched and unpacked them, by which time we're inside
recipetool and have an active tinfoil instance that will prevent bitbake
being run. To avoid this being an issue, we allow recipetool to get to
the point where we know we need npm and then exit with a specific exit
code, at which point devtool can try to build it and then if that
succeeds, it will re-execute recipetool. This is definitely not ideal,
but it can't really be refactored and done properly until we do the
tinfoil2 refactoring; in the mean time though we still want to be
helpful to the user.
Fixes [YOCTO #10337].
(From OE-Core rev: f40662bde5aab158c4e4c3c3ff5e68665a4194a5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We want to remove the -f/--fetch option at some point (as you can now
specify a URL as a positional argument instead) so display a warning
that it's deprecated if it is used.
(From OE-Core rev: 43476d77a91d50454ca26e016a3413b24e9f3aec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were supposed to be printing out the specified recipe name here but I
forgot to specify a parameter for the string.
(From OE-Core rev: 87f844e533adfc229a5d26857a82cc6b125216c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that recipeutils.validate_pn() properly validates characters used in
the name, we can drop this bit checking for '/' since that's not
permitted by validate_pn(). (The FIXME comment here - that I myself
apparently wrote - is questionable since that function was clearly never
intended to allow '/', perhaps I was misled because it was broken and
did so).
(From OE-Core rev: e010d9be3709cf3c607ffc03c3188abe4e1e9eb4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In keeping with making recipetool create / devtool add as easy to use as
possible, users shouldn't have to know how to reformat git short form ssh
URLs for consumption by BitBake's fetcher (for example
user@git.example.com:repo.git should be expressed as
git://user@git.example.com/repo.git;protocol=ssh ) - instead we should
just take care of that automatically. Add some logic in the appropriate
places to do that.
(From OE-Core rev: 78c672a72f49c4b6cfd8c247efcc676b0ba1681a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
(From OE-Core rev: 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
(From OE-Core rev: 5ec6d9ef309b841cdcbf1d14ac678d106d5d888a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When using PATCHTOOL = "git", the user of the system is not really the
committer - it's the build system itself. Thus, specify "dummy" values
for username and email instead of using the user's configured values.
Various parts of the devtool code that need to make commits have also
been updated to use the same logic.
This allows PATCHTOOL = "git" and devtool to be used on systems where
git user.name / user.email has not been set (on versions of git where
it doesn't default a value under this circumstance).
If you want to return to the old behaviour where the externally
configured user name / email are used, set the following in your
local.conf:
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME = ""
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL = ""
Fixes [YOCTO #8703].
(From OE-Core rev: 765a9017eaf77ea3204fb10afb8181629680bd82)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The --wilcard-version flag was only used in the srcrev variant of the
update-recipe command.
(From OE-Core rev: d3057cba0b01484712fcee3c52373c143608a436)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Unfortunately to implenent multiconfig support in bitbake some APIs
had to change. This updates code in OE to match the changes in bitbake.
Its mostly periperhal changes around devtool/recipetool
[Will need a bitbake version requirement bump which I'll make when merging]
(From OE-Core rev: 041212fa37bb83acac5ce4ceb9b7b77ad172c5c3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
(From OE-Core rev: fa550fcb9333d59b28fc0e4aebde888831410f5c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to update the recipe
or create the bbappend depending on the destination.
(From OE-Core rev: 5067cdc73483b53d46d9bf584723e41957c7ec54)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to reset the recipe
at the end.
(From OE-Core rev: b8d398516556eaf97679e28ad58448f570984b52)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If there are files in the oe-local-files directory which are identical
to the original version, then we shouldn't be copying them to the
destination layer. This is particularly important when using the -a
option to create a bbappend.
(From OE-Core rev: 9230bfcc839eb35630949f0a8ed058ca1fa944b1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool update-recipe was defaulting to the ${BPN} named directory when
adding patches next to a recipe, but that meant if you already had files
in a ${BP} named directory (i.e. name and version) or "files" then you'd
end up with two directories next to the recipe, which is usually not
what you want. To avoid this, look through FILESPATH and take the first
one that's the same level or one level down from the recipe and already
exists, if any.
(From OE-Core rev: c7a8190cf8bdf86ba850b6780b8e951e90232c06)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is currently possible to specify a file (e.g. a tarball) on the local
disk as the source, but you have to know to put file:// in front of it.
There's really no need to force users to jump through that hoop if they
really want to do this so check if the specified source is a file and
prefix it with file:// if that's the case.
Also ensure the same works for "devtool add" at the same time.
(From OE-Core rev: 71350003790c38e84b0e525a71a2fe5d24e3d083)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Certain recipes cannot be used with devtool extract / modify / upgrade -
usually because they don't provide any source. Return a specific exit
code (4) so that scripts such as scripts/contrib/devtool-stress.py know
the difference between this and a genuine failure.
(From OE-Core rev: ffd295fed4ab81fc0bd00bb145ef4d72c49584bf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were attempting to open the recipe file unconditionally here - we
need to account for the possibility that the recipe file has been
deleted or moved away by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 47822a2aff56fd338c16b5ad756feda9f395a8a1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In OE-Core revision 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc I changed
the default update-recipe behaviour to only update patches for commits
that were changed; unfortunately I failed to handle the --initial-rev
option which was broken after that point. Rework how the initial
revision is passed in so that it now operates correctly.
(From OE-Core rev: b2ca2523cc9e51a4759b4420b07b0b67b3f5ac43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow specifying more than one recipe on the devtool reset command line.
Also tweak the help text slightly.
(From OE-Core rev: ad92ed8e4f7f48a3d212962531d596b36f6b284f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Converted return value of items() keys() and values() to
lists when dictionary is modified in the loop and when
the result is added to the list.
(From OE-Core rev: 874a269eb1d70060c2f3b3f8b70800e2aea789f4)
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
(From OE-Core rev: d022b4335100612d6596cc4c4956cb98ed5873cc)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Iterators now return views, not lists in python3. Where we need
lists, handle this explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: caebd862bac7eed725e0f0321bf50793671b5312)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If fetching source from a git repository, typically within OpenEmbedded
we encourage setting SRCREV to a fixed revision, so change to do that by
default and add a -a/--autorev option to use "${AUTOREV}" instead.
(From OE-Core rev: 000480c42797dd2f03ebc3bc6d1dabfc6a7b75f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Strictly speaking we ought to explicitly shut down a tinfoil instance
when we're done with it. This doesn't affect modify's operation but is
important if you want to be able to call into modify() from another
plugin (though anyone doing so should be advised that the function is
by no means a stable API and is subject to change in future releases).
(From OE-Core rev: 626dbadf22b57a22a8f8b9d1957937120f4ba4d5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we add from a fetched URL we are supposed to turn the resulting
source tree into a git repository (if it isn't already one). However, we
were using the older deprecated option name here instead of the
positional argument, so "devtool add -f <url>" resulted in the repo
being created but "devtool add <url>" didn't, which was wrong.
Also update the oe-selftest tests to check that this worked.
(From OE-Core rev: a7b6b1f8cc1c096724f794ac9dee312b0f771f66)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The npm class just installs whatever is in ${S}; if you're using
externalsrc in conjunction with it the symlinks (oe-workdir and oe-logs
by default) plus singletask.lock will end up in the final package, which
isn't really right. Introduce a variable so we know the path the files
will be installed into within npm.bbclass, and append to do_install
within the workspace bbappend to delete the files.
(From OE-Core rev: 766845e06db9d7d595e836ea1364c16fa132a413)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Otherwise (if the symlink is named .config) kernel build considers
source tree as dirty and fails.
[YOCTO #9270]
(From OE-Core rev: d36699b28c661880957d744420df9e23cdd76957)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow plugins to create additional files to go alongside the recipe. The
plugins don't know what the output filename is going to be, so they need
to put the files in a temporary location and add them to an "extrafiles"
dict within extravalues where the destination filename is the key and
the temporary path is the value.
devtool add was also extended to ensure these files get moved in and
preserved upon reset if they've been edited by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 334b9451111b7e3efbb43b3a4eecebcab8ec6f0e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
