(Bitbake rev: cc712f3257904960247a7532cfc4611f3dccd36c)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With the introduction of SPDX-License-Identifier headers, we don't need a ton
of header boilerplate in every file. Simplify the files and rely on the top
level for the full licence text.
(Bitbake rev: 695d84397b68cc003186e22f395caa378b06bc75)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds the SPDX-License-Identifier license headers to the majority of
our source files to make it clearer exactly which license files are under.
The bulk of the files are under GPL v2.0 with one found to be under V2.0
or later, some under MIT and some have dual license. There are some files
which are potentially harder to classify where we've imported upstream code
and those can be handled specifically in later commits.
The COPYING file is replaced with LICENSE.X files which contain the full
license texts.
(Bitbake rev: ff237c33337f4da2ca06c3a2c49699bc26608a6b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We need inotify support within bitbake and pyinotify provides the best
mechanism to add this. We have a few options:
a) Depend on pyinotify from the system
b) Add in our own copy
c) Only use pyinotify in cases like the memory resident server
For a), it would mean adding in dependencies, updating documentation and
generally creating churn for users as well as having implications for things
like the build-appliance recipe.
It turns out that glibc has the C functionality we need from version 2.4
onwards (2006) and that we just need a single python file for b), there
is no binary module needed. We therefore add in a copy of pyinotify 0.9.5
into the tree meaning we can depend on it simply and unconditionally.
c) is unattractive as we need fewer possible code paths, not more.
(Bitbake rev: d49004a4e247e3958a2f7ea9ffe5ec92794e1352)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
