mirror of
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky.git
synced 2025-07-19 21:09:03 +02:00

Fixes [YOCTO #11630] I took the Yocto Linux kernel overview list of kernels out of the dev-manual and moved them to the "Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance" section in Appendix A of the kernel-dev manual. This is a much more logical area to introduce this type of Yocto Linux kernel information. (From yocto-docs rev: 0a5154cb4c23697f2b8e2341c8e1dc07362443d2) Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <srifenbark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
343 lines
18 KiB
XML
343 lines
18 KiB
XML
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
|
|
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd"
|
|
[<!ENTITY % poky SYSTEM "../poky.ent"> %poky; ] >
|
|
|
|
<appendix id='kernel-dev-concepts-appx'>
|
|
<title>Advanced Kernel Concepts</title>
|
|
|
|
<section id='kernel-big-picture'>
|
|
<title>Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Kernels available through the Yocto Project (Linux Yocto kernels),
|
|
like other kernels, are based off the Linux kernel releases from
|
|
<ulink url='http://www.kernel.org'></ulink>.
|
|
At the beginning of a major Linux kernel development cycle, the
|
|
Yocto Project team chooses a Linux kernel based on factors such as
|
|
release timing, the anticipated release timing of final upstream
|
|
<filename>kernel.org</filename> versions, and Yocto Project
|
|
feature requirements.
|
|
Typically, the Linux kernel chosen is in the final stages of
|
|
development by the Linux community.
|
|
In other words, the Linux kernel is in the release candidate
|
|
or "rc" phase and has yet to reach final release.
|
|
But, by being in the final stages of external development, the
|
|
team knows that the <filename>kernel.org</filename> final release
|
|
will clearly be within the early stages of the Yocto Project
|
|
development window.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
This balance allows the Yocto Project team to deliver the most
|
|
up-to-date Linux Yocto kernel possible, while still ensuring that
|
|
the team has a stable official release for the baseline Linux
|
|
kernel version.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As implied earlier, the ultimate source for Linux Yocto kernels
|
|
are released kernels from <filename>kernel.org</filename>.
|
|
In addition to a foundational kernel from
|
|
<filename>kernel.org</filename>, the available Yocto Linux kernels
|
|
contain a mix of important new mainline developments, non-mainline
|
|
developments (when there is no alternative), Board Support Package
|
|
(BSP) developments, and custom features.
|
|
These additions result in a commercially released Yocto
|
|
Project Linux kernel that caters to specific embedded designer
|
|
needs for targeted hardware.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
You can find a web interface to the Yocto Linux kernels in the
|
|
<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_REF_URL;#source-repositories'>Source Repositories</ulink>
|
|
at
|
|
<ulink url='&YOCTO_GIT_URL;'></ulink>.
|
|
If you look at the interface, you will see to the left a
|
|
grouping of Git repositories titled "Yocto Linux Kernel".
|
|
Within this group, you will find several Linux Yocto kernels
|
|
developed and included with Yocto Project releases:
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<emphasis><filename>linux-yocto-4.1</filename>:</emphasis>
|
|
The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with the Yocto
|
|
Project Release 2.0.
|
|
This kernel is based on the Linux 4.1 released kernel.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<emphasis><filename>linux-yocto-4.4</filename>:</emphasis>
|
|
The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with the Yocto
|
|
Project Release 2.1.
|
|
This kernel is based on the Linux 4.4 released kernel.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<emphasis><filename>linux-yocto-4.9</filename>:</emphasis>
|
|
The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with the Yocto
|
|
Project Release 2.3.
|
|
This kernel is based on the Linux 4.9 released kernel.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<emphasis><filename>linux-yocto-4.10</filename>:</emphasis>
|
|
The default stable Yocto Project kernel to use with the
|
|
Yocto Project Release 2.3.
|
|
This kernel is based on the Linux 4.10 released kernel.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<emphasis><filename>linux-yocto-dev</filename>:</emphasis>
|
|
A development kernel based on the latest upstream release
|
|
candidate available.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
<note><title>Notes</title>
|
|
Long Term Support Initiative (LTSI) for Yocto Linux
|
|
kernels is as follows:
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
For Yocto Project releases 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0,
|
|
the LTSI kernel is
|
|
<filename>linux-yocto-3.14</filename>.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
For Yocto Project releases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3,
|
|
the LTSI kernel is <filename>linux-yocto-4.1</filename>.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<filename>linux-yocto-4.1</filename>,
|
|
<filename>linux-yocto-4.4</filename>, and
|
|
<filename>linux-yocto-4.9</filename> are all LTS
|
|
kernels.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
</note>
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Once a Yocto Linux kernel is officially released, the Yocto
|
|
Project team goes into their next development cycle, or upward
|
|
revision (uprev) cycle, while still continuing maintenance on the
|
|
released kernel.
|
|
It is important to note that the most sustainable and stable way
|
|
to include feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev
|
|
process.
|
|
Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from
|
|
various kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily
|
|
compromise quality.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing
|
|
analysis of Linux kernel development, BSP support, and release
|
|
timing to select the best possible <filename>kernel.org</filename>
|
|
Linux kernel version on which to base subsequent Yocto Linux
|
|
kernel development.
|
|
The team continually monitors Linux community kernel development
|
|
to look for significant features of interest.
|
|
The team does consider back-porting large features if they have a
|
|
significant advantage.
|
|
User or community demand can also trigger a back-port or creation
|
|
of new functionality in the Yocto Project baseline kernel during
|
|
the uprev cycle.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Generally speaking, every new Linux kernel both adds features and
|
|
introduces new bugs.
|
|
These consequences are the basic properties of upstream
|
|
Linux kernel development and are managed by the Yocto Project
|
|
team's Linux Yocto kernel development strategy.
|
|
It is the Yocto Project team's policy to not back-port minor
|
|
features to the released Linux Yocto kernel.
|
|
They only consider back-porting significant technological
|
|
jumps ‐ and, that is done after a complete gap analysis.
|
|
The reason for this policy is that back-porting any small to
|
|
medium sized change from an evolving Linux kernel can easily
|
|
create mismatches, incompatibilities and very subtle errors.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The policies described in this section result in both a stable
|
|
and a cutting edge Linux Yocto kernel that mixes forward ports of
|
|
existing Linux kernel features and significant and critical new
|
|
functionality.
|
|
Forward porting Linux kernel functionality into the Linux Yocto
|
|
kernels available through the Yocto Project can be thought of as
|
|
a "micro uprev."
|
|
The many “micro uprevs” produce a Linux Yocto kernel version with
|
|
a mix of important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments
|
|
and feature integrations.
|
|
This Yocto Linux kernel gives insight into new features and
|
|
allows focused amounts of testing to be done on the kernel,
|
|
which prevents surprises when selecting the next major uprev.
|
|
The quality of these cutting edge Linux Yocto kernels is evolving
|
|
and the kernels are used in leading edge feature and BSP
|
|
development.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
<section id='kernel-architecture'>
|
|
<title>Kernel Architecture</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This section describes the architecture of the kernels available through the
|
|
Yocto Project and provides information
|
|
on the mechanisms used to achieve that architecture.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<section id='architecture-overview'>
|
|
<title>Overview</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the
|
|
developer with
|
|
a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is visible to the user.
|
|
The architecture and mechanisms used achieve that goal in a manner similar to the
|
|
upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
You can think of a Yocto Project kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux kernel with
|
|
added features logically structured on top of the baseline.
|
|
The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy implemented by the
|
|
source code manager (SCM) Git.
|
|
For information on Git as applied to the Yocto Project, see the
|
|
"<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_REF_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>" section in the
|
|
Yocto Project Development Manual.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The result is that the user has the ability to see the added features and
|
|
the commits that make up those features.
|
|
In addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the history of what
|
|
made up the baseline kernel.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Project kernel.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
<imagedata fileref="figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png" width="6in" depth="7in" align="center" scale="100" />
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point"
|
|
marks the specific spot (or release) from
|
|
which the Yocto Project kernel is created.
|
|
From this point "up" in the tree, features and differences are organized and tagged.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is common to every kernel
|
|
type and BSP that is organized further up the tree.
|
|
Placing these common features in the
|
|
tree this way means features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the
|
|
structure.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
From the Yocto Project Baseline Kernel, branch points represent specific functionality
|
|
for individual BSPs as well as real-time kernels.
|
|
The illustration represents this through three BSP-specific branches and a real-time
|
|
kernel branch.
|
|
Each branch represents some unique functionality for the BSP or a real-time kernel.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
In this example structure, the real-time kernel branch has common features for all
|
|
real-time kernels and contains
|
|
more branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels.
|
|
The illustration shows three branches as an example.
|
|
Each branch points the way to specific, unique features for a respective real-time
|
|
kernel as they apply to a given BSP.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or branches) to the
|
|
developer that, for all practical purposes, is the kernel needed for any given set
|
|
of requirements.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
<section id='branching-and-workflow'>
|
|
<title>Branching Strategy and Workflow</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The Yocto Project team creates kernel branches at points where functionality is
|
|
no longer shared and thus, needs to be isolated.
|
|
For example, board-specific incompatibilities would require different functionality
|
|
and would require a branch to separate the features.
|
|
Likewise, for specific kernel features, the same branching strategy is used.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This branching strategy results in a tree that has features organized to be specific
|
|
for particular functionality, single kernel types, or a subset of kernel types.
|
|
This strategy also results in not having to store the same feature twice
|
|
internally in the tree.
|
|
Rather, the kernel team stores the unique differences required to apply the
|
|
feature onto the kernel type in question.
|
|
<note>
|
|
The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such that they can be
|
|
shared by all boards and kernel types where possible.
|
|
However, during development cycles or when large features are merged,
|
|
the team cannot always follow this practice.
|
|
In those cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features.
|
|
</note>
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to kernel-specific additions.
|
|
Some BSPs only make sense given certain kernel types.
|
|
So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end of that kernel type for all
|
|
of the BSPs that are supported on that kernel type.
|
|
From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP branch, the BSP is really no
|
|
different than a feature.
|
|
Consequently, the same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to features.
|
|
So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the unique
|
|
differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of branches, it is
|
|
important to realize that from the developer's point of view, there is a linear
|
|
path that travels from the baseline <filename>kernel.org</filename>, through a select
|
|
group of features and ends with their BSP-specific commits.
|
|
In other words, the divisions of the kernel are transparent and are not relevant
|
|
to the developer on a day-to-day basis.
|
|
From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch.
|
|
The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of any other branches at all.
|
|
Of course, there is value in the existence of these branches
|
|
in the tree, should a person decide to explore them.
|
|
For example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at the line-by-line
|
|
code <filename>diff</filename> level is now a trivial operation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized community best practices.
|
|
In particular, the kernel as shipped with the product, should be
|
|
considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a series of
|
|
historical and documented modifications (commits).
|
|
These modifications represent the development and stabilization done
|
|
by the Yocto Project kernel development team.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Because commits only change at significant release points in the product life cycle,
|
|
developers can work on a branch created
|
|
from the last relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project kernel.
|
|
As mentioned previously, the structure is transparent to the developer
|
|
because the kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
<section id='source-code-manager-git'>
|
|
<title>Source Code Manager - Git</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The Source Code Manager (SCM) is Git.
|
|
This SCM is the obvious mechanism for meeting the previously mentioned goals.
|
|
Not only is it the SCM for <filename>kernel.org</filename> but,
|
|
Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many different work flows,
|
|
front-ends and management techniques.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
You can find documentation on Git at <ulink url='http://git-scm.com/documentation'></ulink>.
|
|
You can also get an introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the
|
|
"<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_REF_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>"
|
|
section in the Yocto Project Reference Manual.
|
|
These referenced sections overview Git and describe a minimal set of
|
|
commands that allows you to be functional using Git.
|
|
<note>
|
|
You can use as much, or as little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what
|
|
you need for your project.
|
|
You do not have to be a "Git Master" in order to use it with the Yocto Project.
|
|
</note>
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</appendix>
|
|
<!--
|
|
vim: expandtab tw=80 ts=4
|
|
-->
|