poky/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
Richard Purdie c7592b0147 oeqa: Drop OETestID
These IDs refer to testopia which we're no longer using. We would now use the test
names to definitively reference tests and the IDs can be dropped, along with their
supporting code.

(From OE-Core rev: 8e2d0575e4e7036b5f60e632f377a8ab2b96ead8)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-09 16:31:55 +01:00

86 lines
3.8 KiB
Python

from oeqa.selftest.case import OESelftestTestCase
from oeqa.utils.commands import runCmd, bitbake, get_bb_var, get_bb_vars
from oeqa.utils.decorators import testcase
from oeqa.utils.ftools import write_file
import oe.recipeutils
class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
def test_checkpkg(self):
"""
Summary: Test that upstream version checks do not regress
Expected: Upstream version checks should succeed except for the recipes listed in the exception list.
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST += " commercial"\n'
self.write_config(feature)
pkgs = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
regressed_failures = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'UNKNOWN_BROKEN']
regressed_successes = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'KNOWN_BROKEN']
msg = ""
if len(regressed_failures) > 0:
msg = msg + """
The following packages failed upstream version checks. Please fix them using UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI/UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX
(when using tarballs) or UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX (when using git). If an upstream version check cannot be performed
(for example, if upstream does not use git tags), you can set UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN to '1' in the recipe to acknowledge
that the check cannot be performed.
""" + "\n".join(regressed_failures)
if len(regressed_successes) > 0:
msg = msg + """
The following packages have been checked successfully for upstream versions,
but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please remove that line from the recipes.
""" + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
def test_maintainers(self):
"""
Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer
Expected: All oe-core recipes (except a few special static/testing ones) should have a maintainer listed in maintainers.inc file.
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
def is_exception(pkg):
exceptions = ["packagegroup-", "initramfs-", "systemd-machine-units", "target-sdk-provides-dummy"]
for i in exceptions:
if i in pkg:
return True
return False
feature = 'require conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc\n'
self.write_config(feature)
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
with_maintainer_list = []
no_maintainer_list = []
# We could have used all_recipes() here, but this method will find
# every recipe if we ever move to setting RECIPE_MAINTAINER in recipe files
# instead of maintainers.inc
for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
# We are only interested in OE-Core
continue
rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
pn = rd.getVar('PN')
if is_exception(pn):
continue
if rd.getVar('RECIPE_MAINTAINER'):
with_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
else:
no_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
if no_maintainer_list:
self.fail("""
The following recipes do not have a maintainer assigned to them. Please add an entry to meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc file.
""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_maintainer_list]))
if not with_maintainer_list:
self.fail("""
The list of oe-core recipes with maintainers is empty. This may indicate that the test has regressed and needs fixing.
""")