send_qa_email currently fails when dealing with release version starting a
new major, for example 5.0. This has been observed for example when trying
to generate 5.0_M1.rc1
This specific versioning makes previous tag computation method fall through
last branch which currently expects that the current release tag indeed
exists (5.0_M1), which is true when checking regression reports a
posteriori, but not in an autobuilder run (tag is added only when the
release has been "validated")
Fix tag computation for this case by getting previous release tag with git
ls-remote, instead of relying on git describe with a possibly non-existing
tag. While doing so, add a few tests about this specific case.
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It has been observed that some regression reports generation may failed
when the comparision base is a branch (e.g master) because we can not find
any test results associated to the branch HEAD. This is especially true for
branches which often change, because not all revisions on those branch are
subject to CI tests.
To fix that, whenever we are not dealing with a release, parse the latest
tested revision in test results repository on target branch in order to
guess the corresponding revision in poky repository, so we are sure that
revisions passed to yocto_testresults_query are indeed tested and
regression report can be generated
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Test results repository url is used at least twice, so define a constant
holding the url instead of hardcoding it multiple times
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There are some inversions in words used to describe elements of comparison
for regression reporting: the main function of send_qa_email starts using
"base" to talk about the target revision and "compare" to talk about the
reference against which it is compared. Then later in the script, the
"base" is used as "base of comparison"/reference revision, while the
"target" branch/revision appears. This becomes quite confusing when we need
to update the script
Re-align wording to avoid confusion:
- always use "target" to talk about current branch/revision of interest
(the newest)
- always use "base" to talk about the reference branch/revision (the
oldest), against which we want to compare the target revision
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Whilst the script needs to continue if we fail to generate a regression report,
set the exit code accordingly so our CI can flag the issue.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is hard to tell which section of the code specific error messages
come from at present. Add more headers to the output so we can at
least tell which section the messages are from. It also adds some
timing information.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Tests results push command depends on basebranch and comparebranch
variables, which are computed based on config.json content. If this file is
not in sync with current release branch, tests results will be properly
stored in git directory but not pushed onto test results server. Since we
are able to detect this scenario, print at least a warning, without
breaking current build since it could be a release
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As for other scripts in yocto-autobuilder-helper or oecore, use python
logger class instead of raw print calls to allow log level distinction
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Some nightly builders are configured in yocto-autobuilder2 to run master builds.
Those build parameters currently skip all branches of
get_regression_base_and_target, which then return None, while the caller
expects a base and target tuple
Set default behaviour to return previous tag as comparison base and passed
branch as target for such builds
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
d6018b891a broke regression reporting for testing
branches (e.g: master-next in poky, ross/mut in poky-contrib) by ignoring the comparebranch returned by
utils.getcomparison branch
Fix regression reporting for those branches by using comparebranch again. The
fix also refactor/add a intermediary step to guess base and target for
regression reporting, to isolate a bit the logic and make it easier later to add
multiple base/target couples
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
is_non_release_version has an inverted logic which makes its reuse quite
confusing
Transform it as is_release_version and let caller do the negation if needed
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
A new tool named yocto_testresults_query.py has been integrated in poky as a
thin wrapper between send-qa-email and resulttool. The new tool is in charge of
converting tags/branches names to SHA1 revisions and to call resulttool with
those revisions
Remove any code related to tag/branches conversions to SHA1 and use
yocto_testresults_qery.py instead
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Current regression reports do not contain information about versions compared
when generating reports. While it is still possible to get the information by
searching the autobuilder log, it is not convenient. Moreover, future
developments will allow to generate multiple reports (with different bases for
comparison) in a single build.
As a consequence, embed target and base revisions in the report header
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since we are now force-fetching base revisions and target revisions for
regression report generation, we can make testresults clone even more "shallow"
to increase clone speed in CI pipelines
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we try to run send-qa-email to simulate past releases (for example, for
development or debugging), the execution will very likely fail because the
target revision to examine (ie: the poky revision) is too old, and as a
consequence is not contained in the testresults shallow clone anymore (because
testsresults history keeps moving forward as builds are triggered on
autobuilder). As a consequence, force-fetch the "target" revision, as it is
already done for the "base" revision
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Instead of only generating regressions reports against HEAD of relevant branch, compute
most relevant tag (ie : release) against which we can check for regressions. General rules
introduced are the following :
- milestone release is checked against previous milestone if possible, otherwise
against major release
- point release is checked against previous point release if possible,
otherwise against major release
- major release is checked against previous major release
- a non release build is checked against base branch
Examples :
- 4.1.2.rc1 is checked against yocto-4.1.1
- 4.1.2 is checked against yocto-4.1.1
- 4.1.1.rc1 is checked against yocto-4.1
- 4.1.1 is checked against yocto-4.1
- 4.1 is checked against yocto-4.0
- 4.1.rc4 is checked against yocto-4.0
- 4.1_M2.rc1 is checked against 4.1_M1
- 4.1_M2 is checked against 4.1_M1
- 4.1_M1.rc1 is checked against yocto-4.0
- 4.1_M1 is checked against yocto-4.0
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This wrapping allows importing send_qa_email.py in another script without
executing the QA emailing routine. This is useful for unit testing the script
internal functions
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This rename fixes send-qa-email regarding python guidelines, which allows to
import the script content in another script (for unit testing purpose for
example)
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
