meta-freescale/LICENSE
Dima Zavin 73926e3059 license: clarify the licensing for the project's metadata
Presently, the recipe files in meta-freescale are under an ambiguous
license. There is a EULA file at the root, but it's clearly not meant
to apply as the default license as it is only explicitly called out in
a few recipes and mirrors the language of the LSDK. The yocto upstream
projects are meant to be distributed under a more liberal license than
the LSDK.

There are several licenses listed is custom-licenses/, but those again
only apply to specific recipes (e.g. NXP-Binary-EULA).

The license for the recipes themselves (and for the layer metadata, etc.)
is not clear and is problematic when attempting to host a mirror of this
code. So, add a LICENSE file that describes this situation, and provide
a reference copy of the MIT license (taken from poky/meta/).

Signed-off-by: Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com>
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
2019-01-10 10:59:06 -02:00

495 B

Different components of meta-freescale are under different licenses (a mix of MIT and proprietary). Please see:

COPYING.MIT (MIT) custom-licenses/* (Various EULAs, included by recipes)

All metadata is MIT licensed unless otherwise stated. Source code and binaries included in tree for individual recipes are under the LICENSE stated in the associated recipe (.bb file) unless otherwise stated.

License information for any other files is either explicitly stated or defaults to GPL version 2.